Page 3 of 4
Re: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:07 am
by rexmitchell
Dad24GreatKids wrote:It's more likely to pass if they retain the $200 tax. I hope it passes as is, but politicians normally hate to give up a revenue stream. I'm just speculating, but I bet they would generate more revenue by passing this bill and reducing the tax to $100. They'd surely make up the difference just on added volume. What they give up is the tracking mechanism.
This^.....Could it pass, sure. Will the tax stamp go away? Not a chance in the world. They aren't about to give up that funding. Either way it has my support simply because I don't think it is fair to wait for NFA items and the hoops you have to jump through to get them. I'll pay the tax stamp but I want the background check to be the same as for a firearm. I think that is a fair compromise.
Re: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:13 am
by allisji
locke_n_load wrote:allisji wrote:Syntyr wrote:
No. Likely won't happen and if it does the bill contained many are that says 200 atf fees after 10/22 would be refunded.
I sent $400 to the ATF on 9/30. They cashed it on 10/11. I guess I get hosed.
You could cancel the stamps and get a refund if it passed before your forms are approved.
This is an old thread. My stamps came in about 8 months ago.
Re: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:27 am
by bblhd672
allisji wrote:This is an old thread. My stamps came in about 8 months ago.
Yes, it's an old thread, but the bill is still active in the House and Senate.
If Trump is elected and Republicans retain control of both House and Senate, expect it to move forward toward a vote.
Re: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:44 am
by allisji
bblhd672 wrote:allisji wrote:This is an old thread. My stamps came in about 8 months ago.
Yes, it's an old thread, but the bill is still active in the House and Senate.
If Trump is elected and Republicans retain control of both House and Senate, expect it to move forward toward a vote.
Yes, I didn't mean to indicate anything about the status of the Bill. Certainly I would still love to see the Bill passed. But I'm also glad that I didn't wait to buy my suppressors.
Re: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:36 am
by bblhd672
allisji wrote:bblhd672 wrote:allisji wrote:This is an old thread. My stamps came in about 8 months ago.
Yes, it's an old thread, but the bill is still active in the House and Senate.
If Trump is elected and Republicans retain control of both House and Senate, expect it to move forward toward a vote.
Yes, I didn't mean to indicate anything about the status of the Bill. Certainly I would still love to see the Bill passed. But I'm also glad that I didn't wait to buy my suppressors.
Man, it would sure be great to eliminate the months of waiting and paperwork required in order to purchase "hearing protection"!
Re: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:56 am
by ScottDLS
Oh no...Republicans want to make "especially dangerous" items (silencers) easier to get without registering them and no waiting periods.
Criminals will now have easy access to these silent death machines...and they will fill our streets.
No one needs a silencer to hunt deer..

Re: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 1:25 pm
by locke_n_load
allisji wrote:locke_n_load wrote:allisji wrote:Syntyr wrote:
No. Likely won't happen and if it does the bill contained many are that says 200 atf fees after 10/22 would be refunded.
I sent $400 to the ATF on 9/30. They cashed it on 10/11. I guess I get hosed.
You could cancel the stamps and get a refund if it passed before your forms are approved.
This is an old thread. My stamps came in about 8 months ago.
Didn't notice the thread resurrection.
Congrats though!
Re: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 2:10 pm
by allisji
locke_n_load wrote:allisji wrote:locke_n_load wrote:allisji wrote:Syntyr wrote:
No. Likely won't happen and if it does the bill contained many are that says 200 atf fees after 10/22 would be refunded.
I sent $400 to the ATF on 9/30. They cashed it on 10/11. I guess I get hosed.
You could cancel the stamps and get a refund if it passed before your forms are approved.
This is an old thread. My stamps came in about 8 months ago.
Didn't notice the thread resurrection.
Congrats though!
Thanks! I have used my .22 suppressor. I somehow haven't had my PTP .45 Ranger 11B outside with my Glock 21 to try that one out. I definitely need to make that happen.
Re: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:37 pm
by Ruark
ScottDLS wrote:Criminals will now have easy access to these silent death machines...and they will fill our streets.
Actually, that's exactly what we'd hear. Just like "assault rifles" are made to "spew death indiscriminately," suppressors (no.... they're "silencers") make a gun go "pffft, pffft." We know it does because we've seen it in the movies. So bad guys will be able to walk up and shoot somebody in silence and nobody will even know it happened!!!
As much as I'd like to, I can't see this getting past the starting line.
Re: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 2:42 pm
by uthornsfan
My co-worker just clued me into this. I think I just got even more happy. I am greatly looking forward to this passing and hopefully its expanded to include SBRs.
Re: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 3:00 pm
by Pariah3j
I have renewed hopes this may actually happen now that we control the White House and both chambers. (Crosses fingers)

Re: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 3:05 pm
by allisji
I doubt that it will have any priority in the next year or so, but it's odds of passing into law definitely increased greatly with the election of Trump and the republican controlled congress. Hopefully it gets some movement before the 2018 elections.
Re: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 3:09 pm
by bblhd672
Contacting your Senators and Representatives, let them know you support this legislation and want to get it to a floor vote.
If they don't hear from us, there will be no priority placed upon moving it forward.
Re: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2016 3:34 pm
by Morbidrealities
ScottDLS wrote:How about repealing 18 USC 922(o), so we can register new machineguns under the NFA.

Do that and get rid of the sbr crapola....man a nice folding stock vector in full auto .45 would be fantastic, lol
Re: House introduces bill to deregulate suppressors
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 9:44 pm
by Ruark
Maybe someday you'll be able to buy one at Academy for $99.95.
