TexasCHLforum.com

ScottDLS wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:"The gunman, a woman,....." Now there's a contradiction in terms if I ever heard one!

We're yuckin' it up about this, et al, but sooner or later, "a hard rain's gonna fall"......and it ain't gonna' pretty.

Gunwomyn? Gunperson?

How about, "The shooter, a woman..."

Or murderer or killer.

Female murder/killer

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigatio ... 11713.html

Nasim Aghdam

It appears Aghdam controlled multiple YouTube channels, including one with videos of her speaking Farsi.

Aghdam also quotes Adolf Hitler, saying, “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”

“There is no equal growth opportunity on YouTube.”

In one online rant, she complained that YouTube censored her content by imposing an age restriction on one of her workout videos because they were too racy.

lived in Southern California

Yeah it's a domestic dispute.

Shooter's Dad warned police about her. Police questioned her that morning:

He had even warned police she could be heading to YouTube’s headquarters because she “hated” the company and was upset over the demonetization of her videos.

"Officers located an adult female by the same name asleep in a vehicle in a Mountain View parking lot early this morning,"

When the family realized that was near YouTube headquarters in San Bruno, they told police about her recent complaints about how the company was “ruining her life.” They claim police told them they would be keeping an eye on her.


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarko ... k-n2467665

I wish they and we would quit referring to all of the mass murderers and killers as "shooters". All gun owners are or should be shooters. Shooting and shooters are not a bad. When an armed citizen or cop responds by shooting at the killer/murderer, that person is also a shooter. When someone is shooting other innocent people they are "murderers" or "killers".

The "not NRA member" gunperson ?


This is all the NRA's fault and George W. Bush and Rafael Cruz Sr.

Would it be sexist, for the press to report immediately that a woman mass shooter had a domestic dispute with her boyfriend who worked at Youtube?

Did the news cast report that she took her life when the good guys with guns showed up to confront her?

The fire alarm was pulled. One witness was evacuating the building on a skateboard. Only in California.

As usual media wanting to be first got a lot wrong. Not a domestic dispute with a boyfriend. Was strictly an attack because YouTube de-monetized a lot of her content.

Chris Loesch's (Dana's husband) tweet summarizes situation:

https://twitter.com/ChrisLoesch/status/ ... 6824399873

Oldgringo wrote:

ScottDLS wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:"The gunman, a woman,....." Now there's a contradiction in terms if I ever heard one!

We're yuckin' it up about this, et al, but sooner or later, "a hard rain's gonna fall"......and it ain't gonna' pretty.

Gunwomyn? Gunperson?

How about, "The shooter, a woman..."

Don't worry, some University will give us an appropriate list of gender neutral pronouns that are acceptable.

https://www.cnsnews.com/blog/cnsnewscom ... unds-henry

SewTexas wrote:

Liberty wrote:

SewTexas wrote:wow, a woman....that's really odd.

Bad relationship I bet. Hades has no furry like ...

that guy must have really, really, really screwed up really BAD!!

Why are you assuming it was a guy? Obviously you need to check your heterosexual privilege!

bblhd672 wrote:

SewTexas wrote:

Liberty wrote:

SewTexas wrote:wow, a woman....that's really odd.

Bad relationship I bet. Hades has no furry like ...

that guy must have really, really, really screwed up really BAD!!

Why are you assuming it was a guy? Obviously you need to check your heterosexual privilege!

bblhd672 wrote:

SewTexas wrote:

Liberty wrote:

SewTexas wrote:wow, a woman....that's really odd.

Bad relationship I bet. Hades has no furry like ...

that guy must have really, really, really screwed up really BAD!!

Why are you assuming it was a guy? Obviously you need to check your heterosexual privilege!

It's more of a sis-gender privilege issue, IMHO. The murderer could have identified as a man, so if their lover identified as a woman, then they would both be heterosexual.

Soccerdad1995 wrote:

bblhd672 wrote:

SewTexas wrote:

Liberty wrote:

SewTexas wrote:wow, a woman....that's really odd.

Bad relationship I bet. Hades has no furry like ...

that guy must have really, really, really screwed up really BAD!!

Why are you assuming it was a guy? Obviously you need to check your heterosexual privilege!

It's more of a cis-gender privilege issue, IMHO. The murderer could have identified as a man, so if their lover identified as a woman, then they would both be heterosexual.

I see what you did there....but it doesn't matter you have blood on your hands since you are an NRA member. David Hogg told me so. And it's Bush's fault.

I wonder if they just assumed because it's a woman it had to be "love" related....only a slightly surprising jump really. BUT, the media should have learned long ago not to make assumptions.