Re: Nobody but John Cornyn
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:45 pm
Joe Manchin has a stronger spine than Cornyn.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
I always vote for his Republican primary challenger, BUT, I'll never vote for a Dem or not vote.LDB415 wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 10:14 am I will be supporting whoever runs against him next time. If he sadly wins another November shot I will not vote for him. I may even vote for the democrat because unlike Cornyn he/she at least wears their suit and admits it.
extremist wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 10:17 amI always vote for his Republican primary challenger, BUT, I'll never vote for a Dem or not vote.LDB415 wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 10:14 am I will be supporting whoever runs against him next time. If he sadly wins another November shot I will not vote for him. I may even vote for the democrat because unlike Cornyn he/she at least wears their suit and admits it.
That is counterproductive.
Cornyn has been quite adept at negotiating rights away.K.Mooneyham wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 10:45 am Still, I feel that Senator Cornyn has let us down by playing the compromise game.
Exactly.Chemist45 wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:08 pm "Compromise"
In the immortal words of Andre the Giant: "You keep using that word. I don't think you know what it means."
In a compromise, each side gives up something in order to get something.
I know what Cornyn gave up: Red flag laws, extended background checks, more money to be wasted.
But what did our side get?
If your answer is that the anti-gun side took slightly less than what they originally wanted, that's not compromise it is capitulation.
But not a balanced compromise. For expanded background checks and red flags, we would need NFA items deregulated too.Boxerrider wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 2:27 pmExactly.Chemist45 wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:08 pm "Compromise"
In the immortal words of Andre the Giant: "You keep using that word. I don't think you know what it means."
In a compromise, each side gives up something in order to get something.
I know what Cornyn gave up: Red flag laws, extended background checks, more money to be wasted.
But what did our side get?
If your answer is that the anti-gun side took slightly less than what they originally wanted, that's not compromise it is capitulation.
If the bill also included nationwide carry reciprocity, then that would be a compromise.
Red Flag laws are unconstitutional, and also a hill I would die on. I don't feel that's a valid negotiating point. Registries are in the same category, IMHO since they inevitably lead to confiscation.seph wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 2:30 pmBut not a balanced compromise. For expanded background checks and red flags, we would need NFA items deregulated too.Boxerrider wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 2:27 pmExactly.Chemist45 wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:08 pm "Compromise"
In the immortal words of Andre the Giant: "You keep using that word. I don't think you know what it means."
In a compromise, each side gives up something in order to get something.
I know what Cornyn gave up: Red flag laws, extended background checks, more money to be wasted.
But what did our side get?
If your answer is that the anti-gun side took slightly less than what they originally wanted, that's not compromise it is capitulation.
If the bill also included nationwide carry reciprocity, then that would be a compromise.
With Rush gone it seems like Tucker is the only voice left who is unafraid to speak the truth.philip964 wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 12:22 pm https://youtu.be/PLW40seir8w
Excellent essay on Red Flag Laws and John Cornyn.
The problem is a vote for Cornyn is just another vote for a democrat.extremist wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 10:17 amI always vote for his Republican primary challenger, BUT, I'll never vote for a Dem or not vote.LDB415 wrote: Wed Jun 15, 2022 10:14 am I will be supporting whoever runs against him next time. If he sadly wins another November shot I will not vote for him. I may even vote for the democrat because unlike Cornyn he/she at least wears their suit and admits it.
That is counterproductive.
Apparently the sticking points are on the Red Flag funding and the "Boyfriend loophole".“I don’t know what they have in mind, but I’m through talking.”
MoreChemist45 wrote: Thu Jun 16, 2022 9:15 pm Potential good news:
https://redstate.com/bonchie/2022/06/16 ... ut-n579614
Cornyn saidApparently the sticking points are on the Red Flag funding and the "Boyfriend loophole".“I don’t know what they have in mind, but I’m through talking.”
Cornyn wants the states without red flag laws to be able to spend the money on Mental Health programs and the dems don't like that idea.
I've read the description of the "Boyfriend loophole" but I don't get it. Maybe someone can explain it to me.