The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
Their day will come. I have a feeling the Zimmerman's will show no mercy when it's their turn to sue.Rex B wrote:Of course, now they are going after Zimmerman's wife for perjury with another weak case.
Vindictive jerks
http://pjmedia.com/blog/vindictive-now- ... ry-charge/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Pawpaw wrote:Killing it would be racist.
It should tell you something about how well informed you aren't when you follow the news media.bizarrenormality wrote:Looking back I'm not sure what to think about this forum discussing "lean" a year before it was "breaking news" during the trial. viewtopic.php?f=83&t=53427&start=1080" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Exactly who is on trial in that article, Mona Nelson, or David Davis? The accused in the courtroom appears to be Mona Nelson, but her attorneys appear to be trying David Davis.philip964 wrote:http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas ... houtexhcat
No national media coverage of this trial and its right here in Houston or we wouldn't even know about it.
Can we look forward to Quannel X protest marches if she is found guilty?
At least it's not George Zimmerman this time.The Annoyed Man wrote:Exactly who is on trial in that article
Gee, I wonder why.Comments are disabled for this video.
TAM, I agree the article is very confusing. No information about the kidnapping and murder included in an article about a kidnapping and murder trial??The Annoyed Man wrote:Exactly who is on trial in that article, Mona Nelson, or David Davis? The accused in the courtroom appears to be Mona Nelson, but her attorneys appear to be trying David Davis.philip964 wrote:http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas ... houtexhcat
No national media coverage of this trial and its right here in Houston or we wouldn't even know about it.
Can we look forward to Quannel X protest marches if she is found guilty?
And Q10 will never spout anything but idiocy, because he is an intellectual and moral idiot.
The ability to string together cognizant thoughts and cohesive sentences by journalists is lost. I stopped taking the newspaper after the umpteenth time of reading a paragraph referring to something, event, name, etc. never stated in the article. Her lawyer Allen Tanner is a slug. He is famous for his gangster rap defense of a cold blooded cop killer in Houston. He represented someone I know personally in a sentencing trial and disregarded everything his client told him. He introduced a confidential document from my friend's psychiatrist that was very damaging. I won't go into great detail but it was a serious crime my friend committed during a six month spell of being off his rocker and he pleaded guilty to the charges. He was just in court for sentencing by a jury and Tanner managed to get him 50 years when he could have accepted a plea bargain for 25 yrs. The information he let slip by made it mandatory he serve half his sentence before he's eligible for parole versus about one third.
This makes me furious! Not a shred of truth to be found.philip964 wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUKzDANF6QU
PSA for Stand up to Stand your Ground shows a reenactment of the Trayvon Martin shooting.
Probably not a good day for this to break out.
