TexasCHLforum.com

The Annoyed Man wrote:Someone please explain to me how suspension of the 3 day rule means that this bill has been passed. I thought it had only passed on to a 3rd reading.

And they immediately voted on it again, and it passed but the Dem's didn't vote for it that time.

Something's not right here.

Scott Farkus wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:Someone please explain to me how suspension of the 3 day rule means that this bill has been passed. I thought it had only passed on to a 3rd reading.

And they immediately voted on it again, and it passed but the Dem's didn't vote for it that time.

Something's not right here.

My thought exactly. Ellis et al are up to something stinky.

joe817 wrote:

croc870 wrote:https://twitter.com/lmcgaughy/status/601889103483969536

Noooooooooooooooooo!

"Senate secretary just confirmed to press that even if chamber adopts Huffines/Dutton amendment, would have to be concurred by House #txlege"

That tweet is from 6:05 pm and conflicts with reports that I have been given, including the Lt Gov's office.

The Annoyed Man wrote:

Scott Farkus wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:Someone please explain to me how suspension of the 3 day rule means that this bill has been passed. I thought it had only passed on to a 3rd reading.

And they immediately voted on it again, and it passed but the Dem's didn't vote for it that time.

Something's not right here.

My thought exactly. Ellis et al are up to something stinky.

What could they do?????
If it's to the governors desk.....it just needs to be inked.
I think they are always up to something stinky.......JMHO

I'm confused... Is 910 going to the governor or not?

TXBO wrote:

joe817 wrote:

croc870 wrote:https://twitter.com/lmcgaughy/status/601889103483969536

Noooooooooooooooooo!

"Senate secretary just confirmed to press that even if chamber adopts Huffines/Dutton amendment, would have to be concurred by House #txlege"

That tweet is from 6:05 pm and conflicts with reports that I have been given, including the Lt Gov's office.

Oh gosh TXBO!!!! Thanks for the catch!! When I read that, my heart stopped beating, and didn't take time to analyze. T!hank you!!

joe817 wrote:

TXBO wrote:

joe817 wrote:

croc870 wrote:https://twitter.com/lmcgaughy/status/601889103483969536

Noooooooooooooooooo!

"Senate secretary just confirmed to press that even if chamber adopts Huffines/Dutton amendment, would have to be concurred by House #txlege"

That tweet is from 6:05 pm and conflicts with reports that I have been given, including the Lt Gov's office.

Oh gosh TXBO!!!! Thanks for the catch!! When I read that, my heart stopped beating, and didn't take time to analyze. T!hank you!!

If the amendment wasn't the same then, it wasn't the same at the end, right?

https://twitter.com/RodneyEllis" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Sen. Ellis’ statement on open carry amendment
[Press release] Sen. Ellis’ statement on open carry amendment
http://www.rodneyellis.com/2015/05/22/s ... amendment/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Bill Status
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/BillLook ... Bill=HB910" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Bill filed by Phillips on 1/23/2015.

Stage 2
Bill reported out of House committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety with vote of 7 Ayes, 1 Nays, 0 Present Not Voting, 1 Absent.

Stage 3
Bill passed the House.

Stage 4
Bill reported out of Senate committee on State Affairs with vote of 7 Ayes, 1 Nays, 0 Present Not Voting, 1 Absent.

Stage 5
Bill passed the Senate.

Stage 6
Not reached.

Stage 7
Not reached.

joe817 wrote:

TXBO wrote:

joe817 wrote:

croc870 wrote:https://twitter.com/lmcgaughy/status/601889103483969536

Noooooooooooooooooo!

"Senate secretary just confirmed to press that even if chamber adopts Huffines/Dutton amendment, would have to be concurred by House #txlege"

That tweet is from 6:05 pm and conflicts with reports that I have been given, including the Lt Gov's office.

Oh gosh TXBO!!!! Thanks for the catch!! When I read that, my heart stopped beating, and didn't take time to analyze. T!hank you!!

joe817, you just %%^*^ off the entire board...HAHA LOL, it's all good man j/k

joe817 wrote:

TXBO wrote:

joe817 wrote:

croc870 wrote:https://twitter.com/lmcgaughy/status/601889103483969536

Noooooooooooooooooo!

"Senate secretary just confirmed to press that even if chamber adopts Huffines/Dutton amendment, would have to be concurred by House #txlege"

That tweet is from 6:05 pm and conflicts with reports that I have been given, including the Lt Gov's office.

Oh gosh TXBO!!!! Thanks for the catch!! When I read that, my heart stopped beating, and didn't take time to analyze. T!hank you!!

I still haven't put both amendments side by side and verified, so I'm trusting information I've been given. Hopefully someone can verify soon.

Is the Huffines amendment published anywhere yet?

safety1 wrote:
What could they do?????
If it's to the governors desk.....it just needs to be inked.
I think they are always up to something stinky.......JMHO

They may be hatching a plan to kill Campus Carry in the other house, once and for all.

For what it's worth, the state website shows the next stage as "Governor Action".

txglock21 wrote:For what it's worth, the state website shows the next stage as "Governor Action".

"Suspend the constitutional three day rule"

What does this mean re: the Texas constitution? I did a search & it turned up a few sections.