The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
Yes exactly, the most serious crime here will be a magazine with more than ten rounds.LDP wrote: Wed Apr 15, 2020 11:51 am 94 rounds? That's too many. Can't fire that many from low-capacity magazines.
I call fake news!
A federal judge on Thursday blocked a California law requiring background checks for people buying ammunition, issuing a sharply worded rebuke of “onerous and convoluted” regulations that violate the constitutional right to bear arms.
U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez in San Diego ruled in favor of the California Rifle & Pistol Association, which asked him to stop the checks and related restrictions on ammo sales.
“The experiment has been tried. The casualties have been counted. California’s new ammunition background check law misfires and the Second Amendment rights of California citizens have been gravely injured,” Benitez wrote in a 120-page opinion granting the group's motion for a preliminary injunction.
I was just chatting on Twitter last night with someone in California about the injunction. He said he was headed to Reno, Nevada after work today to buy some 1000 round cases of Mk 262 5.56 to take advantage of the injunction before the case gets to the 9th Circuit who'll probably reinstate the law.Grayling813 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2020 7:36 am Judge tosses California ammunition purchase law
https://kmph.com/amp/news/local/judge-t ... rchase-law
A federal judge on Thursday blocked a California law requiring background checks for people buying ammunition, issuing a sharply worded rebuke of “onerous and convoluted” regulations that violate the constitutional right to bear arms.
U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez in San Diego ruled in favor of the California Rifle & Pistol Association, which asked him to stop the checks and related restrictions on ammo sales.
“The experiment has been tried. The casualties have been counted. California’s new ammunition background check law misfires and the Second Amendment rights of California citizens have been gravely injured,” Benitez wrote in a 120-page opinion granting the group's motion for a preliminary injunction.
Thats a GREAT way around that fact that (apparently) most Cali FFL's are still following the law , despite it being struck down.The Annoyed Man wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2020 8:15 am I was just chatting on Twitter last night with someone in California about the injunction. He said he was headed to Reno, Nevada after work today to buy some 1000 round cases of Mk 262 5.56 to take advantage of the injunction before the case gets to the 9th Circuit who'll probably reinstate the law.
If I still lived in California, that’s exactly what I’d do anyway, regardless of the law. That law is unconstitutional, and I have no moral obligation to obey it. In fact, I have a moral obligation to defy it. Anybody who’s ever driven from Las Vegas to Los Angeles knows that 100s of thousands of vehicles travel I-15 every single day between Nevada and California. There is no law enforcement capability to shut the whole interstate down and search EVERY single vehicle on that highway. It just can’t be done without completely eliminating 1-15 as a part of the FEDERAL interstate highway system.....something which even the commies in DC wouldn’t support. It’s just too important a part of the transportation infrastructure to shut it down.PriestTheRunner wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2020 9:51 pmThats a GREAT way around that fact that (apparently) most Cali FFL's are still following the law , despite it being struck down.The Annoyed Man wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2020 8:15 am I was just chatting on Twitter last night with someone in California about the injunction. He said he was headed to Reno, Nevada after work today to buy some 1000 round cases of Mk 262 5.56 to take advantage of the injunction before the case gets to the 9th Circuit who'll probably reinstate the law.
Nothing illegal in that move for one week.
In addition to the murder and assault with a deadly weapon charges, Thomas also was charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm, carrying a loaded firearm, carrying a concealed firearm and vandalism.
https://bearingarms.com/cam-e/2020/05/1 ... cks-in-ca/Grayling813 wrote: Fri Apr 24, 2020 7:36 am Judge tosses California ammunition purchase law
https://kmph.com/amp/news/local/judge-t ... rchase-law
A federal judge on Thursday blocked a California law requiring background checks for people buying ammunition, issuing a sharply worded rebuke of “onerous and convoluted” regulations that violate the constitutional right to bear arms.
U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez in San Diego ruled in favor of the California Rifle & Pistol Association, which asked him to stop the checks and related restrictions on ammo sales.
“The experiment has been tried. The casualties have been counted. California’s new ammunition background check law misfires and the Second Amendment rights of California citizens have been gravely injured,” Benitez wrote in a 120-page opinion granting the group's motion for a preliminary injunction.
The zero-cash bail emergency mandate in California, which has led to reduced prison populations to reduce the spread of COVID-19, ignores victims and favors criminals, Fresno County Sheriff Margaret Mims asserted Friday night
It's an oversight Mims believes "flies in the face of anything in [her] 41 years of law enforcement."
"It has nothing to do with public safety," she concluded. "It has everything to do with ignoring victims and giving inmates and people [who] commit [a] crime a free pass."