Page 4 of 4
Re: VA declares veteran to be incompetent, denied RKBA
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 10:52 am
by puma guy
seamusTX wrote:puma guy wrote:This is a little off topic, but having never pawned a weapon is it a requirement to do a background check to take the weapon out of pawn?
Yes, redeeming a pawned firearm is the same as buying one from scratch, with respect to the Form 4473 and NICS check.
http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/brady-l ... redemption" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Jim
Interesting concept. Confiscation of property without compensation.
Re: VA declares veteran to be incompetent, denied RKBA
Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2010 10:57 am
by seamusTX
You have to keep in mind that a pawn ticket can be traded or sold. The person redeeming the pawn may not be the person who pawned the item.
This is the law and has been for at least 15 years (I don't keep track of these things). You can write to your congressman about changing it. I don't see any groundswell of demand to change this particular law.
- Jim
Re: VA declares veteran to be incompetent, denied RKBA
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 1:54 pm
by EconDoc
chartreuse wrote:There are many words to describe this. Tragic, disappointing, outrageous, disgraceful and wrong are some of them. Sadly "surprising" is not.
Personally, I think that the words, dastardly, despicable, and reprehensible are among the appropriate words to describe this action.
Re: VA declares veteran to be incompetent, denied RKBA
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 5:40 pm
by boba
EconDoc wrote:chartreuse wrote:There are many words to describe this. Tragic, disappointing, outrageous, disgraceful and wrong are some of them. Sadly "surprising" is not.
Personally, I think that the words, dastardly, despicable, and reprehensible are among the appropriate words to describe this action.
Defrauding the taxpayers to get a few extra dollars a month is reprehensible.