Page 4 of 4

Re: Suggest a .45 to meet these criteria

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 7:24 pm
by Hoi Polloi
Mike from Texas wrote:
Hoi Polloi wrote:This goal isn't a primary carry gun. I have one I can use for that. I'm disappointed that my gun doesn't have any way to make it purty and want one that looks as nice as it shoots. It's a second gun so I can be picky and care about such trivialities, right? Who among you will tell me it's a bad reason for acquiring another gun? :biggrinjester:
Far from me to question anyone's reason for buying a gun. Heck I've bought them just because I wanted to try one out.

Based on your comments above, nothing is more beautiful or customizable than a finely crafted 1911.
It's a crying shame I don't care for 1911s, isn't it? :cryin

Pretty, but just doesn't feel "right" or intuitive when I shoot them. I want something like this. :drool:
Image

Re: Suggest a .45 to meet these criteria

Posted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 10:19 pm
by SQLGeek
I'll echo the others recommending a Sig 220. Sounds like that would be your best fit.

Re: Suggest a .45 to meet these criteria

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 8:39 am
by TridentFrog
How about the Ruger P345? Not a compact by any means, but I haven't heard anyone else mention it.

Re: Suggest a .45 to meet these criteria

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:05 am
by Middle Age Russ
In addition to the SIGs and the P345 mentioned earlier, you might look at third generation Smith and Wesson pistols. The CS45 (Chief's Special) offers the smallest, lightest variant, and they go up in size/weight to the 4506 (all stainless slide and frame, full-size).

Shootability and recoil management vary with the weight, with the largest/heaviest offering less perceived recoil and quicker return to target. I had a second generation Smith 9MM that was a delight to shoot and absolutely reliable but the ergonomics was not great. The ergos for the third generation are better, and I have heard nothing but good things regarding the reliability of the third-gen. Smiths.

I am not certain how large the selection of aftermarket stocks for the third generation Smiths is, but there are at least a couple of different options from the standard stock.

Re: Suggest a .45 to meet these criteria

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 10:15 am
by MoJo
Hoi Polloi wrote:
Mike from Texas wrote:
Hoi Polloi wrote:This goal isn't a primary carry gun. I have one I can use for that. I'm disappointed that my gun doesn't have any way to make it purty and want one that looks as nice as it shoots. It's a second gun so I can be picky and care about such trivialities, right? Who among you will tell me it's a bad reason for acquiring another gun? :biggrinjester:
Far from me to question anyone's reason for buying a gun. Heck I've bought them just because I wanted to try one out.

Based on your comments above, nothing is more beautiful or customizable than a finely crafted 1911.
It's a crying shame I don't care for 1911s, isn't it? :cryin

Pretty, but just doesn't feel "right" or intuitive when I shoot them. I want something like this. :drool:
Image
Here's a suggestion, instead of looking for a gun, look for grips you like and see what guns they will fit. Your largest selection of "Purdy" handgun stocks are going to be for 1911 pattern pistols, single action revolvers and S&W double action revolvers. Most other guns with changeable grip panels will have some selection but, most will be wooden.

Hogue, Eagle, and Ajax all make a wide variety of grips there are numerous others google "handgun grips"

edit: 1911s are an aquired taste for some folks, sort of like sushi - - - I mean bait! "rlol"

Re: Suggest a .45 to meet these criteria

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:06 pm
by RottenApple
SQLGeek wrote:I'll echo the others recommending a Sig 220. Sounds like that would be your best fit.
I'll echo your echo and add some personal experience. My Pop gave me a P220 for my birthday this year. It very quickly became my favorite gun and I shoot it at lot. I've already put at least a thousand rounds through it. Once my I have my plastic I intend on carrying it full time.

Re: Suggest a .45 to meet these criteria

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:51 pm
by SQLGeek
How do you plan to carry it? I don't carry yet but that seems like a lot of gun to conceal...not saying you won't be able to because I know plenty of folks conceal full sized guns.

Re: Suggest a .45 to meet these criteria

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 1:58 pm
by RottenApple
SQLGeek wrote:How do you plan to carry it? I don't carry yet but that seems like a lot of gun to conceal...not saying you won't be able to because I know plenty of folks conceal full sized guns.
I'm planning on getting a kholster for starters. I've been told it's a rather comfortable IWB. For now I have an OWB DeSantis paddle holster that I can conceal quite well. The other day I had it on while working around the house and my wife never knew it was there till we went to bed.

Re: Suggest a .45 to meet these criteria

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:05 pm
by SQLGeek
Gotcha, good luck and hope the plastic gets there quick. :thumbs2:

Re: Suggest a .45 to meet these criteria

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:06 pm
by 74novaman
SQLGeek wrote:How do you plan to carry it? I don't carry yet but that seems like a lot of gun to conceal...not saying you won't be able to because I know plenty of folks conceal full sized guns.
People are leery of the prospect of concealing full sized guns, but no one should be. I've carried a 5" 1911 in an IWB holster wearing just shorts and a loose t shirt many times without a second glance my way from anyone. Honestly, weight of the gun is more of a problem than concealment.

Re: Suggest a .45 to meet these criteria

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:26 pm
by Dave2
74novaman wrote:Honestly, weight of the gun is more of a problem than concealment.
Only because you aren't wearing a 2nd one on the other side to balance everything out :mrgreen:

Re: Suggest a .45 to meet these criteria

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:44 pm
by 74novaman
Dave2 wrote:
74novaman wrote:Honestly, weight of the gun is more of a problem than concealment.
Only because you aren't wearing a 2nd one on the other side to balance everything out :mrgreen:
"rlol" "rlol" Thats the problem! :mrgreen:

Re: Suggest a .45 to meet these criteria

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:34 pm
by SQLGeek
74novaman wrote:
Dave2 wrote:
74novaman wrote:Honestly, weight of the gun is more of a problem than concealment.
Only because you aren't wearing a 2nd one on the other side to balance everything out :mrgreen:
"rlol" "rlol" Thats the problem! :mrgreen:
Three or four magazines full of .45 ought to do it. :anamatedbanana