VMI77 wrote:[
I really don't understand these people that want to kill an animal, especially one that is obviously someone's pet, just because it appears on their property. I find a dog running loose I don't assume that some irresponsible owner left him to roam, I assume that something happened that allowed him to escape and try to return him to his owner. Unless a dog is attacking you he is innocent of any wrong doing, he's just being a dog. I've returned several dogs and have yet to encounter one that was free because of an irresponsible owner. Many times, living in town, a yard guy left a gate open on a fenced yard. I've known dogs to slip a collar and get away from an owner who is desperately trying to retrieve him, or make a dash out the front door in a moment of distraction. When our children were little and had friends over one time the friends weren't careful enough and our dog ran out and got hit by a car. It was an accident and I don't blame the driver for that but I also don't think it would have justified shooting or poisoning him (fortunately he wasn't seriously injured). Out in the country now, a dog has followed my wife home, and other dogs have gotten away from their owner and wandered onto our property. Each time the owners were aware they'd gotten loose and came to get them; but even if they hadn't, I'm not going to kill a dog for being a dog or a cat for being a cat. I can't imagine deliberately poisoning an animal under any circumstances.
I agree completely with your sentiments.
However, I do understand what would motivate someone to want to kill an animal that is apparently someone's pet and it ain't pretty.
JALLEN wrote: I was given my first cat more than 60 years ago, and have had hundreds of them since, not all at once of course, and I am not at all sure that one "owns" a cat.
Like all of God's creatures, they are subject to risks, of nature, weather, other animals, illness, old age, etc. but it requires a deranged and malignant soul to intentionally harm them.
