870, or 887?

"A pistol is what you use to fight your way back to the rifle you never should have left behind!" Clint Smith, Thunder Ranch

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B

User avatar
Pawpaw
Senior Member
Posts: 6745
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
Location: Hunt County

Re: 870, or 887?

Post by Pawpaw »

That looks really nice TAM. I like that it has a lower sight plane than my 930 SPX does.
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams
MONGOOSE
Banned
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:46 pm

Re: 870, or 887?

Post by MONGOOSE »

I don't understand the need for sights on a SD shotgun.
User avatar
Pawpaw
Senior Member
Posts: 6745
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
Location: Hunt County

Re: 870, or 887?

Post by Pawpaw »

MONGOOSE wrote:I don't understand the need for sights on a SD shotgun.
One word: accuracy.

The normal bead sight is intended for hunting game during daylight. In a HD situation there is a good chance it will be low-light and the sight plane / front bead won't be viable.

A ghost ring setup is a very fast sighting system. If you add tritium or fiber optics to the front sight, it becomes useful in very low light and works that much faster.

Remember, at in-home distances, you're not going to get much spread at all with the shotgun, so you''re shot must be accurate.
Last edited by Pawpaw on Tue Sep 29, 2015 9:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams
MONGOOSE
Banned
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:46 pm

Re: 870, or 887?

Post by MONGOOSE »

I sight down the barrel
MONGOOSE
Banned
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:46 pm

Re: 870, or 887?

Post by MONGOOSE »

Don't need sights for slugs
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts: 26884
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: 870, or 887?

Post by The Annoyed Man »

AndyC wrote:Then don't have them.

We don't really need sights on handguns either, but it sure makes hitting something easier and faster - but you do it your way and we'll do it ours.
Exactly.

For those interested, zeroing for slugs at 100 yards:
https://youtu.be/fJ1c7oCDRKo
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
MONGOOSE
Banned
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:46 pm

Re: 870, or 887?

Post by MONGOOSE »

I'm not takin deer hunting....what does a HD situation have to do with 100 yds. At the range we are takin about in HD, you will be lucky to think about the sights
Taypo
Banned
Posts: 1054
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 12:36 pm

Re: 870, or 887?

Post by Taypo »

MONGOOSE wrote:I'm not takin deer hunting....what does a HD situation have to do with 100 yds. At the range we are takin about in HD, you will be lucky to think about the sights
People who train with sights and shoot with sights will be thinking about sights if they need them. If finding them under stress is a problem for you, then you're absolutely correct removing them.
MONGOOSE
Banned
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:46 pm

Re: 870, or 887?

Post by MONGOOSE »

I've seen practice go out the window under rstress. We will just have to agree to disagree.
Taypo
Banned
Posts: 1054
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 12:36 pm

Re: 870, or 887?

Post by Taypo »

MONGOOSE wrote:I've seen practice go out the window under rstress. We will just have to agree to disagree.
Nobody in their right mind advocates removing the sights from a handgun or a rifle if they can't hit the target under stress. Why is a shotgun any different? Because that magical cone of death that shoots from the end of it?

That's right up there with the whole "all you need to do is rack it and it will scare the bad guy away."
MONGOOSE
Banned
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:46 pm

Re: 870, or 887?

Post by MONGOOSE »

MONGOOSE wrote:I sight down the barrel
Why
User avatar
Jago668
Senior Member
Posts: 992
Joined: Sun May 03, 2015 12:31 am

Re: 870, or 887?

Post by Jago668 »

Wanted to post on big dots as well. I didn't know they were in Fort Worth until TAM posted it. I had been contemplating getting a set for my pistol. Drove over there today, folks there were real friendly. Got to look at all the configurations on a pistol. Also got some direct advice on how to put them on my pistol as well. Figured I would mention it since TAM talked about going over there. If you are in the DFW area and were thinking about the sights go by there. It isn't an actual store it's just their office, but they are happy to have you in.
NRA Benefactor Member
MONGOOSE
Banned
Posts: 346
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2015 3:46 pm

Re: 870, or 887?

Post by MONGOOSE »

Taypo wrote:
MONGOOSE wrote:I've seen practice go out the window under rstress. We will just have to agree to disagree.
Nobody in their right mind advocates removing the sights from a handgun or a rifle if they can't hit the target under stress. Why is a shotgun any different? Because that magical cone of death that shoots from the end of it?

That's right up there with the whole "all you need to do is rack it and it will scare the bad guy away."
I use XS big dots on my pistols.....when have I ever advocated taking sights off handguns or rifles.....I specifically asked about shotguns.
Post Reply

Return to “Rifles & Shotguns”