TexasCHLforum.com

Beiruty wrote:

Richbirdhunter wrote:I live in Texas and I am uneasy about Islam

I live in Texas and I am Muslim, and I am uneasy about terrorism, mass killing, for a motive or no motive, for abortion, for white supremacy, or home grown terrorism, imported wahabbists terrorism, or whatever might constitute a threat to one's safety.

the loudest, most visible, and most active group of terrorists happen to be Muslim, at this time, but it will change. History has an ebb and flow to it.

Our MSM and the Democratic party are a bigger existential threats to the American Republic than any terrorists.

VMI77 wrote:Our MSM and the Democratic party are a bigger existential threats to the American Republic than any terrorists.

And they do start with your kids at school. Socialism at liberalism at early age, also know as, dumbing down your kids.

I don't think that many folks understand that Beiruty would anger many of the terrorists if they knew he used the word "wahhabist". They really dislike that term, and he can correct me if I am wrong, but they consider it a sort of insult. So, his use of the term says something, to me.

I'm uneasy about meeting my maker before the barrels are hot and I'm out of ammo. We have enough takers in this country we don't need to import more. All immigration needs to cease until this global caliphate is destroyed. After that we can discuss new immigration rules with zero benefits. I don't exist to feed foreigners. Charity needs to stay where it belongs, with the churches.

Beiruty wrote:

VMI77 wrote:Our MSM and the Democratic party are a bigger existential threats to the American Republic than any terrorists.

And they do start with your kids at school. Socialism at liberalism at early age, also know as, dumbing down your kids.

True, and that's one of the reasons we homeschooled our kids. I didn't single out the schools because I consider them mostly to be a product of the Democratic party with the media as facilitators and enablers. What's really scary are the colleges....at least the liberal arts side. What I've heard about the professors and students from my youngest suggests a future that is absolutely terrifying to contemplate.

rbwhatever1 wrote:I'm uneasy about meeting my maker before the barrels are hot and I'm out of ammo. We have enough takers in this country we don't need to import more. All immigration needs to cease until this global caliphate is destroyed. After that we can discuss new immigration rules with zero benefits. I don't exist to feed foreigners. Charity needs to stay where it belongs, with the churches.

And if violence is visited upon us and we do have to meet our maker, let us do so surrounded by a pile of brass.

https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/672549313298481152

CBS News Verified account
‏@CBSNews
NEW: Shooting suspect Tashfeen Malik passed DHS counterterrorism screening as part of her vetting for K-1 visa

https://twitter.com/foxnation/status/672785877253406720
Fox Nation Verified account
‏@foxnation
Report: San Bernardino Shooter Passed DHS Counterterrorism Vetting http://bit.ly/1HKOKAO #SanBernadino

NotRPB wrote:https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/672549313298481152

CBS News Verified account
‏@CBSNews
NEW: Shooting suspect Tashfeen Malik passed DHS counterterrorism screening as part of her vetting for K-1 visa

https://twitter.com/foxnation/status/672785877253406720
Fox Nation Verified account
‏@foxnation
Report: San Bernardino Shooter Passed DHS Counterterrorism Vetting http://bit.ly/1HKOKAO #SanBernadino

Same quality of vetting the administration plans for the Syrian refugees?

mojo84 wrote: ......same quality of vetting the administration plans for the Syrian refugees?

It is really tough the shooter was born and raised in US. Had the same "dumping down" cadering. What goes in one's mind is really tough to discover/monitor/predict.

Beiruty wrote:

mojo84 wrote: ......same quality of vetting the administration plans for the Syrian refugees?

It is really tough the shooter was born and raised in US. Had the same "dumping down" cadering. What goes in one's mind is really tough to discover/monitor/predict.

There was more than one shooter. Not all of them were born in the US. Why do you only select part of the facts to try to make your point?

My comment is in regard to the vetting of refugees. I do not believe it is unreasonable for a sovereign country to be able to vet immigrants and refugees properly before letting them into the country. If it is not possible to vet them properly, then I believe a country has the right to deny entry. Do you agree or disagree with this?


I get and understand not all Muslims are bad people. I don't claim they are.

Beiruty wrote:

mojo84 wrote: ......same quality of vetting the administration plans for the Syrian refugees?

It is really tough the shooter was born and raised in US. Had the same "dumping down" cadering. What goes in one's mind is really tough to discover/monitor/predict.

Pretty much impossible. People close to someone might get warning signs, but even then you don't know what is going to happen just that behavior has changed.

Here is some interesting information. Not sure why but I find it interesting Farook was born and raised in Chicago. His wife was born in Pakistan and spent time in Saudi Arabia.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/san-be ... er-n474246

mojo84 wrote:

Beiruty wrote:

mojo84 wrote: ......same quality of vetting the administration plans for the Syrian refugees?

It is really tough the shooter was born and raised in US. Had the same "dumping down" cadering. What goes in one's mind is really tough to discover/monitor/predict.

There was more than one shooter. Not all of them were born in the US. Why do you only select part of the facts to try to make your point?

My comment is in regard to the vetting of refugees. I do not believe it is unreasonable for a sovereign country to be able to vet immigrants and refugees properly before letting them into the country. If it is not possible to vet them properly, then I believe a country has the right to deny entry. Do you agree or disagree with this?


I get and understand not all Muslims are bad people. I don't claim they are.

You are correct and I agree with you. Immigration is a selective process with National Security and adaptability of the immigrant are crucial. But in cass where a widow with 5 children all under 15 are seeking refuge, what do we do?

Beiruty wrote:

mojo84 wrote:

Beiruty wrote:

mojo84 wrote: ......same quality of vetting the administration plans for the Syrian refugees?

It is really tough the shooter was born and raised in US. Had the same "dumping down" cadering. What goes in one's mind is really tough to discover/monitor/predict.

There was more than one shooter. Not all of them were born in the US. Why do you only select part of the facts to try to make your point?

My comment is in regard to the vetting of refugees. I do not believe it is unreasonable for a sovereign country to be able to vet immigrants and refugees properly before letting them into the country. If it is not possible to vet them properly, then I believe a country has the right to deny entry. Do you agree or disagree with this?


I get and understand not all Muslims are bad people. I don't claim they are.

You are correct and I agree with you. Immigration is a selective process with National Security and adaptability of the immigrant are crucial. But in cass where a widow with 5 children all under 15 are seeking refuge, what do we do?

When I see pictures of the Syrian "refugees", I see very few women and children. The large majority are men in their 20's and 30's. Whether it's a man or woman, they should be able to be properly vetted. If not, they need to find asylum elsewhere. Otherwise, why have a sovereign country with borders? The Syrians need to stand up and fight for their country.

One of the shooters in this latest shooting was a woman. Women shouldn't be exempt and arbitrarily let in either. She even got past the DHS screening process.