Page 4 of 4
Re: Disarming at Seaworld, San Antonio was not enough
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2016 10:20 pm
by Beiruty
LTCTLB wrote:Quick question about Sea World...
Is it still 30.06 posted? By posts here it suggests yes it is; however, Texas3006.com has a moderator edit stating "It has been noted that the 30.06 signs may have been removed." We are going to be there tomorrow...want to know what to expect.
Posted 30.06 and 30.07. The last time I was there.
Re: Disarming at Seaworld, San Antonio was not enough
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2016 11:37 pm
by thaidragon
Most likely you were profiled because of your family wearing scarves. It's sad to say but with what is going on around the world and what the media portrays people with scarves and head covers, tend to attract attention even if they good law abiding citizens.
Re: Disarming at Seaworld, San Antonio was not enough
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 2:21 pm
by tbrown
Beiruty wrote:First, I was asked why I am carrying. I said I am not and my firearm was in the vehicle and as matter of course I displayed my CHL/DL. Then, I was asked why I am carrying ammo in magazines. I responded, is that a problem? And, why I cannot carry ammo? Short answer, I am not allowed to have ammo inside the park.
If I had a loaded AR magazine in the thigh pocket of my cargo pants, I bet they wouldn't be too happy.
Same thing at the courthouse. Even though I have no gun they won't allow mags for my AR pistol. What's up with that?
Re: Disarming at Seaworld, San Antonio was not enough
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 2:55 pm
by Beiruty
I complied and had no further issue s