Page 4 of 4
Re: Well it's starting already
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 9:42 pm
by parabelum
imkopaka wrote:The item in question is not a weapon - it is modification of a weapon. A modification that the NRA is questioning the legality of. Further, I suspect an outright ban, as Feinstein is proposing, would be less likely than regulation, as the NRA is proposing. For example, make them an NFA item along with full autos. As long as automatic weapons are on that list, it seems logical that this would be too. If machine guns are ever deregulated (unlikely) so would these. Since they serve the same basic function of cranking out rounds very quickly, it fits that they be regulated the same.
Exactly right. And I am sure that you and NRA are fully aware that I can make my AR emulate this ugly bump stock thingy with nothing more then my belt, right?
Will you be calling on "common sense" belt regulations next?
I know you mean well, and I'm not trying to be rude to you nor NRA, heck, I've done wallet support and leg support by talking to people and asking them to join NRA since I came to this Country, but my friend, when I wake up and I see that something related to 2A that even Obama's minions cleared is now being brought up to the chopping block as a political sacrificial toy by none other then the very people I have supported throughout these years, I mean, it's insane.
Moreover, I think that politicians who push this as well as NRA will lose dearly in the long term. Bad precedent.
Re: Well it's starting already
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2017 10:48 pm
by oljames3
anygunanywhere wrote:imkopaka wrote:I don't want them to regulate it, I just don't care if they do or not.
Well pard, I hope that when something you own is fixing to get regulated, the owners of the bump stocks might be the ones who support you. That's why.
imkopaka wrote: It seems to me that there is no legitimate reason to use one, so why should I care?
Again, even though you see no use for one, you should support those who do. Is it really such a huge effort to do so?

Re: Well it's starting already
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 6:05 am
by Liberty
Nobody needs 5.56mm ammo. do they ?

Re: Well it's starting already
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2017 8:43 am
by bigtek
Liberty wrote:Nobody needs 5.56mm ammo. do they ?
Nobody except the military and police.
And I'm not sure about the police.

Re: Well it's starting already
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 11:19 am
by SQLGeek
Liberty wrote:Nobody needs 5.56mm ammo. do they ?

Nah, let's stick to those wimpy hunting rounds like .300 Winmag.

Re: Well it's starting already
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 12:04 pm
by Steve5115
Houston police Chief Acevedo on gun control: 'If not now, then when?'
http://abc13.com/houston-pd-chief-urges ... s/2511186/
Re: Well it's starting already
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 12:48 pm
by BBYC
Let's start with him and his employees. Give it a couple decades. Then we'll have some data to look at.
How about it Chief? Are you a leader or a low life?
Re: Well it's starting already
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:01 pm
by bblhd672
BBYC wrote:
Let's start with him and his employees. Give it a couple decades. Then we'll have some data to look at.
How about it Chief? Are you a leader or a low life?
I believe he has demonstrated that low life is the correct answer.
Re: Well it's starting already
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 7:04 pm
by Captain Matt
That evil communist thug should go back to Cuba or California where it's safe to be an enemy of the United States Constitution.