Rob72 wrote: Mon Jul 27, 2020 8:22 pm
Looks to me like Foster's left hand is on the hood, and that stock is resting over his clavicle. If so, that muzzle is a whole lot more inline with the driver, than with the pavement by Foster's feet.
So. Foster is participating in action forcibly impeding the transit of the driver. IANAL, but I suspect that the rifle qualifies this as forcible restraint, even though its a car vs. pedestrian scenario.
The driver, has no option of escape, other than to drive through the (not visibly armed) crowd.
Foster made public statements, contemporaneous to the event, that demonstrate an aggressive and confrontational mindset.
Now, if the driver had no "reasonable business" there, e.g., did not live/work in the area, their presence at the scene could be problematic.
If they do have "reasonable business", then the presence of an aggressive armed individual, in the midst of a mob, is reasonably seen as a threat.
I would be curious about his AF time. He has the smell of an unfulfilled GI Joe, traipsing his fiance out in an almost baiting fashion, trying to create a scenario in which he could "defend" her.