TexasCHLforum.com

Sen Estes also says he wants to keep the bill "clean" with no amendments. Good. So the next guy up says "I respect that" but I am going to offer a bunch of amendments anyway.

Jasonw560 wrote:No, Rodriguez. No holster amendment. No shiny badge amendment.

No, Rodriguez.

Aggie_engr wrote:

Jasonw560 wrote:No, Rodriguez. No holster amendment. No shiny badge amendment.

We don't need no stinkin badges.

How will this be implemented? They'll have to call Florida or Az and tell them.

Rodriguez trying to end reciprocity for those denied in TX

ELB wrote:Sen Estes also says he wants to keep the bill "clean" with no amendments. Good. So the next guy up says "I respect that" but I am going to offer a bunch of amendments anyway.

Respecting his request and agreeing and complying are completely different. None of these will be accepted, just let him have his moment because as Estes said, it's his right to offer amendments.

Let's see how long it goes before they start rushing him through them.

Wrong amendment for this Bill ! Has nothing to do with this ! ....Next amendment..

viking1000 wrote:Wrong amendment for this Bill !

That doesn't matter. As long as others "feel safe".

Oh, geez. Waco brought up. Didn't take long.

Here comes the Waco event. Anyone surprised that this was brought up?

Bet none of the bikers had a license from any state.

Jasonw560 wrote:Oh, geez. Waco brought up. Didn't take long.

I saw a report that they found over 100 handguns from the Waco incident. I wonder how many holsters and CHLs got inventoried?

Estes nailed it.

Estes is completely correct. No one is saying this amendment doesn't have merit, but it needs to be analyzed as to what impacts to other state reciprocity it would have and offered as its own standalone bill.