Page 5 of 5
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2022 11:23 am
by philip964
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/worl ... 33598.html
Justice Alito has a great sense of humor mocks Boris Johnson and Ex Prince Harry for criticizing our laws. “ Boris paid the price” .
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2022 6:52 pm
by philip964
https://apple.news/A4euBEeKuQfWEQsc2W9Hj7w
Lol CNN upset over Alitos remarks. ( wish I could say how they were hurting, but, I don’t think I can)
I heard him on the radio say it, he was hilarious.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 9:54 am
by philip964
https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-co ... n-c94b5a9c
SCOTUS shoots down affirmative action in college admissions, MSM sobbing on TV right now.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2023 11:36 am
by powerboatr
yep and on que the head race baiter obama was hurt and put out a remark
that was counter to the scotus ruling
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/lawmake ... =100483183
"The Obamas
Former first lady Michelle Obama wrote about her own experience as one of the few Black students on her college campus and said in a statement that "today, my heart breaks for any young person out there who's wondering what their future holds — and what kinds of chances will be open to them."
"Today is a reminder that we've got to do the work not just to enact policies that reflect our values of equity and fairness, but to truly make those values real in all of our schools, workplaces, and neighborhood," she said.
Former President Barack Obama, in a shorter statement, said: "Like any policy, affirmative action wasn't perfect. But it allowed generations of students like Michelle and me to prove we belonged. Now it's up to all of us to give young people the opportunities they deserve — and help students everywhere benefit from new perspectives."
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2023 11:19 am
by philip964
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2023 12:53 pm
by Grayling813
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2023 10:48 pm
by srothstein
And more importantly, well for this forum, SCOTUS accepted the Rahimi case for next fall:
https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/06/just ... t-dispute/
This is the challenge to federal law banning people under a protective order from having guns. As I understand it, the appeal is a direct result of Bruen, where they are arguing that there is no history or tradition of forfeiting rights due to a protective order without a conviction.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 11:14 am
by puma guy
powerboatr wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 11:36 am
yep and on que the head race baiter obama was hurt and put out a remark
that was counter to the scotus ruling
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/lawmake ... =100483183
"The Obamas
Former first lady Michelle Obama wrote about her own experience as one of the few Black students on her college campus and said in a statement that "today, my heart breaks for any young person out there who's wondering what their future holds — and what kinds of chances will be open to them."
"Today is a reminder that we've got to do the work not just to enact policies that reflect our values of equity and fairness, but to truly make those values real in all of our schools, workplaces, and neighborhood," she said.
Former President Barack Obama, in a shorter statement, said: "Like any policy, affirmative action wasn't perfect. But it allowed generations of students like Michelle and me to prove we belonged. Now it's up to all of us to give young people the opportunities they deserve — and help students everywhere benefit from new perspectives."
Both Barack and Michelle lost their law licenses or as they stated, they "gave them up". No lawyer I have ever run across would voluntarily give up being a lawyer except to keep from having it stripped and be disbarred. Bill Clinton fought to get his back even though he had no intention to ever practice again.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 5:53 pm
by powerboatr
puma guy wrote: Sat Jul 01, 2023 11:14 am
powerboatr wrote: Thu Jun 29, 2023 11:36 am
yep and on que the head race baiter obama was hurt and put out a remark
that was counter to the scotus ruling
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/lawmake ... =100483183
"The Obamas
Former first lady Michelle Obama wrote about her own experience as one of the few Black students on her college campus and said in a statement that "today, my heart breaks for any young person out there who's wondering what their future holds — and what kinds of chances will be open to them."
"Today is a reminder that we've got to do the work not just to enact policies that reflect our values of equity and fairness, but to truly make those values real in all of our schools, workplaces, and neighborhood," she said.
Former President Barack Obama, in a shorter statement, said: "Like any policy, affirmative action wasn't perfect. But it allowed generations of students like Michelle and me to prove we belonged. Now it's up to all of us to give young people the opportunities they deserve — and help students everywhere benefit from new perspectives."
Both Barack and Michelle lost their law licenses or as they stated, they "gave them up". No lawyer I have ever run across would voluntarily give up being a lawyer except to keep from having it stripped and be disbarred. Bill Clinton fought to get his back even though he had no intention to ever practice again.
they have so much baggage i bet giving them up was easy
michelle or mike has been quoted as suffering from depression..yup she is a man and it depresses her/him and the girls are not theirs
i was surprised al sharpton or jessie have been silent..must not getting paid to shoe outrage

Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2023 6:49 pm
by Chemist45
powerboater wrote:
i was surprised al sharpton or jessie have been silent..must not getting paid to shoe outrage
You must have missed this:
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4073 ... ve-action/
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2023 11:45 am
by powerboatr
yup i did
thats what surprised me, he was not front and center on cnn or the other left channels.
of course the view was loosing their minds

Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 5:43 pm
by srothstein
powerboatr wrote: Sun Jul 02, 2023 11:45 amthats what surprised me, he was not front and center on cnn or the other left channels.
of course the view was loosing their minds

They have minds? That's a shocker.
Re: SCOTUS
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2024 1:14 pm
by philip964
Washington Post suggestions for you constitutionalists out there, if SCOTUS does its job.
“Just as the Women’s March and the March for Our Lives fortified public opinion and activism, even without prompting an immediate legislative result, a March for Democracy would help galvanize public opinion and turn the election into a mandate on the court.
Finally, the recommendations above, if unsuccessful in curbing the court’s arrogance, would set the stage for wholesale court reform. Should Democrats win the White House and majorities in the House and Senate, no matter how narrow, the entire panoply of reforms and responses should be on the table. Those could include Alito’s impeachment (especially if he snubs a subpoena), a mandatory ethics code, Supreme Court term limits and court expansion. (If need be, Democrats would need to adjust the too-long abused filibuster to attend to the job of fixing a disgraced court.)
Confidence in the court has already sunk to historic lows in recent years; should Alito and Thomas sit on the Trump immunity case and put their thumbs on the scale for him, public support for bold reforms may well surge.
Alito and Thomas, coupled with Roberts’s clueless passivity and inability to exert ethical leadership, have plunged the Supreme Court into a crisis. But they have thereby opened the door to much-needed reforms that could restore the court’s luster. Defenders of the rule of law should grasp this historic opportunity to rehabilitate a faltering, increasingly disreputable institution.”
Re: SCOTUS- rules against Trump on Deportation
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 1:45 pm
by philip964
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/nati ... t/3895469/
Deportation of Venezuelan gang members under alien enemies act must stop.