TexasCHLforum.com

tacticool wrote:

Charles L. Cotton wrote:Are you seriously calling for defeat of the Senators who passed campus-carry, employer parking lots and range protection!?

Chas.

Did the legislature pass all three? That's great news! Has Perry signed them yet?

Just the Senate, not the House yet.

Thanks for the clarification. I guess I have a different definition of laws passing.

tacticool wrote:Thanks for the clarification. I guess I have a different definition of laws passing.

The Senators did their job this term. The Representatives are the ones we need to start finding new jobs for.

Interesting - it was worked on in committee again -


H Reported favorably as amended 05/19/2011
H Recommended to be sent to Local & Consent 05/19/2011
H Amendment(s) considered in committee 05/19/2011
H Vote reconsidered in committee 05/19/2011


http://www.legis.state.tx.us/BillLookup ... Bill=SB905

We need amendment text!

artx wrote:Interesting - it was worked on in committee again -

That worries me. The version that came out of committee on the 16th was reasonable. I hope they didn't backslide (although it would be a hoot if they added renewal CHLs and not legislators. )

apostate wrote:

artx wrote:Interesting - it was worked on in committee again -

That worries me. The version that came out of committee on the 16th was reasonable. I hope they didn't backslide (although it would be a hoot if they added renewal CHLs and not legislators. )

or campus carry !

artx wrote:

apostate wrote:

artx wrote:Interesting - it was worked on in committee again -

That worries me. The version that came out of committee on the 16th was reasonable. I hope they didn't backslide (although it would be a hoot if they added renewal CHLs and not legislators. )

or campus carry !

I was thinking, after reading about SB 1581 today, that this might be a vehicle for some form of campus carry.

this might be a vehicle for some form of campus carry.

That is what I was thinking.
No germane issues, definitely a 1 topic bill (CHL)

Owens wrote:

this might be a vehicle for some form of campus carry.

That is what I was thinking.
No germane issues, definitely a 1 topic bill (CHL)

There's absolutely no way to amend campus-carry to SB905. It's caption is too narrow and campus-carry wouldn't be germane.

Chas.

SB905 Caption wrote:Relating to the application of certain concealed handgun license laws to statewide elected officials, certain current and former members of the legislature, and certain federal and state employees.

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

Owens wrote:

this might be a vehicle for some form of campus carry.

That is what I was thinking.
No germane issues, definitely a 1 topic bill (CHL)

There's absolutely no way to amend campus-carry to SB905. It's caption is too narrow and campus-carry wouldn't be germane.

Chas.

SB905 Caption wrote:Relating to the application of certain concealed handgun license laws to statewide elected officials, certain current and former members of the legislature, and certain federal and state employees.

Charles, maybe an amendment making Universities one of the places Legislators would be exempt and permitted to carry.... then an amendment to include CHL renewals or CHLs in general..... German? Yes? Thoughts???

There was lots of time for Doctor of the Day so enough time to pass Campus Carry if they care about our lives and safety.

AFCop wrote: Charles, maybe an amendment making Universities one of the places Legislators would be exempt and permitted to carry.... then an amendment to include CHL renewals or CHLs in general..... German? Yes? Thoughts???

The Kampus Nationalsozialistischen will say it's not German. They need to disarm the people to rule.

Keith B wrote:You know folks, there is one other alternative to get this to apply to you; run for office in the House or Senate and get elected.

, be careful what you wish for...I know of several people in this forum who are extremely politically qualified, motivated and potentially well-funded to make a run on that gaggle of (insert your favorite term), that could very well make an impact on day one in the next session...

Because they got what they wanted, and there is no real pressure to do anything else for the serfs this session...

I'm not bitter, nor mad that this has happened, we had very little chance to effect the proper corrrective measures this time...So next session will be a little different...In some ways, more than others...

I hope that if there are any participants here that are in Senatorial District 7 that you remember these little things in the next election cycle...