The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
Wouldn't it be more effective in the middle of the line?MeMelYup wrote:Actually the TSA is creating a target rich environment for a suicide bomber. Get to the front of the line and detonate yourself. You would get at least 50 people, maybe more.
Depends on whether you want to take out just civilians, or civilians AND TSA agents & equipment.snorri wrote:Wouldn't it be more effective in the middle of the line?MeMelYup wrote:Actually the TSA is creating a target rich environment for a suicide bomber. Get to the front of the line and detonate yourself. You would get at least 50 people, maybe more.
If in a ticket line the middle would be better, but entering the security zone the place for the most mayham would be just before or as you stepped into the booth.sjfcontrol wrote:Depends on whether you want to take out just civilians, or civilians AND TSA agents & equipment.snorri wrote:Wouldn't it be more effective in the middle of the line?MeMelYup wrote:Actually the TSA is creating a target rich environment for a suicide bomber. Get to the front of the line and detonate yourself. You would get at least 50 people, maybe more.
I wish someone would damage those scanners. The TSA didn't purchase maintenance contracts on them, and congress has already blocked additional funding for them. So when a machine dies, it's dead.snorri wrote:I forgot to consider property damage.
WOW. Kinda gives a whole new meaning to "suicide bomber"!jordanmills wrote:I wish someone would damage those scanners. The TSA didn't purchase maintenance contracts on them, and congress has already blocked additional funding for them. So when a machine dies, it's dead.snorri wrote:I forgot to consider property damage.
I wonder what a massive power surge could do. For academic purposes only.sjfcontrol wrote:WOW. Kinda gives a whole new meaning to "suicide bomber"!jordanmills wrote:I wish someone would damage those scanners. The TSA didn't purchase maintenance contracts on them, and congress has already blocked additional funding for them. So when a machine dies, it's dead.snorri wrote:I forgot to consider property damage.
An EMP maybe?tbrown wrote:I wonder what a massive power surge could do. For academic purposes only.sjfcontrol wrote:WOW. Kinda gives a whole new meaning to "suicide bomber"!jordanmills wrote:I wish someone would damage those scanners. The TSA didn't purchase maintenance contracts on them, and congress has already blocked additional funding for them. So when a machine dies, it's dead.snorri wrote:I forgot to consider property damage.
Academically, sure, but they're probably shielded. Plus, I don't think it's worth the effort. It'll just get you arrested and they'll step up their efforts. Legal means FTW!The Annoyed Man wrote:An EMP maybe?tbrown wrote:I wonder what a massive power surge could do. For academic purposes only.sjfcontrol wrote:WOW. Kinda gives a whole new meaning to "suicide bomber"!jordanmills wrote:I wish someone would damage those scanners. The TSA didn't purchase maintenance contracts on them, and congress has already blocked additional funding for them. So when a machine dies, it's dead.snorri wrote:I forgot to consider property damage.
<sigh> Yeah, it is.speedsix wrote:...but it IS a nice thought...
