TexasCHLforum.com

RogueUSMC wrote:It's HU that is on first...

gringo pistolero wrote:Was HU a flight attendant? viewtopic.php?f=83&t=67639" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

03Lightningrocks wrote:

RogueUSMC wrote: It's HU that is on first...

RogueUSMC wrote:you suppose ta be repose...lak dis

gringo pistolero wrote:Was HU a flight attendant? viewtopic.php?f=83&t=67639" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

03Lightningrocks wrote:

RogueUSMC wrote: It's HU that is on first...

03Lightningrocks wrote:

RogueUSMC wrote:you suppose ta be repose...lak dis

gringo pistolero wrote:Was HU a flight attendant? viewtopic.php?f=83&t=67639" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

03Lightningrocks wrote:

RogueUSMC wrote: It's HU that is on first...

In before da lock.

Abraham wrote:Thanks to you all for proving my point.

You've done a Mah-Vell-Us job.

The Annoyed Man wrote:

Abraham wrote:Thanks to you all for proving my point.

You've done a Mah-Vell-Us job.

Rinse and repeat.

sjfcontrol wrote:

The Annoyed Man wrote:

Abraham wrote:Thanks to you all for proving my point.

You've done a Mah-Vell-Us job.

Rinse and repeat.

You forgot "lather"...

Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.

If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.

I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.

Why do this?

WildBill wrote:

Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.

If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.

I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.

Why do this?

It's free and easy.

sunny beach wrote:

WildBill wrote:

Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.

If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.

I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.

Why do this?

It's free and easy.

I use only recycled electrons so it's environmentally friendly.

03Lightningrocks wrote:

sunny beach wrote:

WildBill wrote:

Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.

If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.

I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.

Why do this?

It's free and easy.

I use only recycled electrons so it's environmentally friendly.

You have me thinking. Maybe a carbon tax on re-posting. First we would have to prove it is contributing to global warming, but it is pretty easy to blame almost anything for that these days.

Abraham wrote:I can at times understand the re-posting of an original post with an accompanying response, but most of the time re-posting the original isn't necessary.

If a question is asked, why isn't a simple answer adequate? Most especially if the response is immediately responded to after the question.

I also see multiple re-posts ad nauseam in a single response.

Why do this?

Very few times do I see such re-posting help clarify, if anything, re-posting wily nily seems to muddy things up.

Rant off.