Re: Mass Shooting at Orlando Nightclub
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2016 3:34 am
Bolton, thanks for the links and the work to look them up!
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
Moron.
ACLU = All Communist Loonies Union
"Daily Caller" and "News Foundation" in the same headline. Funny.bblhd672 wrote:ACLU = All Communist Loonies Union
Vote Trump to ensure that our rights to self-protection are not further restricted!
You are spot on correct, Flint. Dead is dead whether you're shot comin' or goin'. Would I lead the charge, I dunno'. What I do know is that Mrs Oldgringo and I do not attend/frequent large gatherings in gun free zones and that includes funerals, weddings, church and such.flintknapper wrote:
Everyone 'exiting' is part of the problem when there is an 'active shooter' situation that occurs in a small space.
Reportedly there were 320 patrons in the building and ONE terrorist. What would happen if 200 people charged the shooter instead of offering him their backs as they ran!
The answer of course is: They would quickly overpower him and end the threat.
Yes it would come at some 'cost' and certainly it goes against the 'nature' of most folks, but we need to give this some thought.
SURELY there were strong, able bodied men in the room. Did NO ONE fight back?
These are different times folks. 'Running' isn't always going to be the best thing to do.
flintknapper wrote: Everyone 'exiting' is part of the problem when there is an 'active shooter' situation that occurs in a small space.
Reportedly there were 320 patrons in the building and ONE terrorist. What would happen if 200 people charged the shooter instead of offering him their backs as they ran!
The answer of course is: They would quickly overpower him and end the threat.
Yes it would come at some 'cost' and certainly it goes against the 'nature' of most folks, but we need to give this some thought.
SURELY there were strong, able bodied men in the room. Did NO ONE fight back?
These are different times folks. 'Running' isn't always going to be the best thing to do.
Redneck_Buddha wrote:More and more it's apparent that you don't want to be caught anywhere, at any time, under any circumstance in a gun-free zone. That doesn't just mean nightclubs, but at these holier-than-thou "progressive" establishments like Half-Brained Books, Sprouts, Toby "Not Really a Cowboy" Keith, etc...
You can carry in church in Texas if you are not given notice (verbal or posted).Oldgringo wrote:You are spot on correct, Flint. Dead is dead whether you're shot comin' or goin'. Would I lead the charge, I dunno'. What I do know is that Mrs Oldgringo and I do not attend/frequent large gatherings in gun free zones and that includes funerals, weddings, church and such.flintknapper wrote:
Everyone 'exiting' is part of the problem when there is an 'active shooter' situation that occurs in a small space.
Reportedly there were 320 patrons in the building and ONE terrorist. What would happen if 200 people charged the shooter instead of offering him their backs as they ran!
The answer of course is: They would quickly overpower him and end the threat.
Yes it would come at some 'cost' and certainly it goes against the 'nature' of most folks, but we need to give this some thought.
SURELY there were strong, able bodied men in the room. Did NO ONE fight back?
These are different times folks. 'Running' isn't always going to be the best thing to do.
I do and have for several years, thank you.flowrie wrote:You can carry in church in Texas if you are not given notice (verbal or posted).Oldgringo wrote:You are spot on correct, Flint. Dead is dead whether you're shot comin' or goin'. Would I lead the charge, I dunno'. What I do know is that Mrs Oldgringo and I do not attend/frequent large gatherings in gun free zones and that includes funerals, weddings, church and such.flintknapper wrote:
Everyone 'exiting' is part of the problem when there is an 'active shooter' situation that occurs in a small space.
Reportedly there were 320 patrons in the building and ONE terrorist. What would happen if 200 people charged the shooter instead of offering him their backs as they ran!
The answer of course is: They would quickly overpower him and end the threat.
Yes it would come at some 'cost' and certainly it goes against the 'nature' of most folks, but we need to give this some thought.
SURELY there were strong, able bodied men in the room. Did NO ONE fight back?
These are different times folks. 'Running' isn't always going to be the best thing to do.
Adt123 wrote:Just saw the article below on Market Watch website. Many comments that we should be aware of.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/its-ti ... 2016-06-13