TexasCHLforum.com

I think Perry could do it....

I think a Perry/Bachman ticket could do it.....hey, how 'bout a Perry/Christie ticket?? I don't think I would want him as the top guy, but as the vp he could be quite entertaining!

loadedliberal wrote:The big 3 in the mix as I see it are Palin, Bachmann and Perry. All have some baggage, none are electable in a general election. Having said that I would rather see Perry than Palin.

At this point I imagine a cadaver would have a shot against the big "0"

loadedliberal wrote:The big 3 in the mix as I see it are Palin, Bachmann and Perry. All have some baggage, none are electable in a general election. Having said that I would rather see Perry than Palin.

From rasmussen:

Generic Republican Candidate 46%, Obama 42%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... ial_ballot

74novaman wrote:

loadedliberal wrote:The big 3 in the mix as I see it are Palin, Bachmann and Perry. All have some baggage, none are electable in a general election. Having said that I would rather see Perry than Palin.

From rasmussen:

Generic Republican Candidate 46%, Obama 42%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... ial_ballot

Yeah and current polling says that Obama would beat Palin in Alaska, whats your point? Polls at this point are about as useful as a hi-point

You stated they were unelectable in a general, yet polling shows that the Kool aide man would have a chance against Obama as long As he had an R by his name...

So my point is you're wrong.

loadedliberal wrote:

74novaman wrote:

loadedliberal wrote:The big 3 in the mix as I see it are Palin, Bachmann and Perry. All have some baggage, none are electable in a general election. Having said that I would rather see Perry than Palin.

From rasmussen:

Generic Republican Candidate 46%, Obama 42%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... ial_ballot

Yeah and current polling says that Obama would beat Palin in Alaska, whats your point? Polls at this point are about as useful as a hi-point

The point? the point is Palin is NOT running and she is still close to beating Obama, thats a sad day for the left.

Paragrouper wrote:

loadedliberal wrote:The big 3 in the mix as I see it are Palin, Bachmann and Perry. All have some baggage, none are electable in a general election. Having said that I would rather see Perry than Palin.

At this point I imagine a cadaver would have a shot against the big "0"

Or a ham sandwich for that matter. A sandwich might do less damage to the country, also.

And even the wackiest conspiracy theorists wouldn't be saying the ham sandwich is Muslim.

Ameer wrote:And even the wackiest conspiracy theorists wouldn't be saying the ham sandwich is Muslim.

Who knows, maybe the ham is the perfect trojan horse for a Muslim....

Ameer wrote:And even the wackiest conspiracy theorists wouldn't be saying the ham sandwich is Muslim.

You never know... It might be a Muslim in disguise!

I stand corrected.

Well, if Bachmann wasn't a non-candidate before, she just signed her campaign's death knell.

http://minnesotaindependent.com/83979/b ... -president" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Lets see, What will the likes of Bill Clinton, John Kerry, John Edwards ect. do to entertain themselves?

dicion wrote:Well, if Bachmann wasn't a non-candidate before, she just signed her campaign's death knell.

http://minnesotaindependent.com/83979/b ... -president" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Never underestimate the Republicans' ability to shoot themselves in the foot. Luckily for them it is only figuratively.

dicion wrote:Well, if Bachmann wasn't a non-candidate before, she just signed her campaign's death knell.

http://minnesotaindependent.com/83979/b ... -president" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This is why I have such a problem with so many in the GOP they say they are for small government but they are really for "their" version of big government. I am leaning heavily toward Gary Johnson, but I do not think he stands a chance.