Page 7 of 23

Re: The Walking Dead!

Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 10:34 pm
by A-R
03Lightningrocks wrote:Another great episode... IMHO! :shock:
:iagree:

I thoroughly enjoyed this one - still action-packed, but with great character development ... Rick Grimes don't take no prisoners ;-) .... just brutal

Re: The Walking Dead!

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:04 am
by 03Lightningrocks
A-R wrote:
03Lightningrocks wrote:Another great episode... IMHO! :shock:
:iagree:

I thoroughly enjoyed this one - still action-packed, but with great character development ... Rick Grimes don't take no prisoners ;-) .... just brutal
YEAH... I love a "take no prisoners" Rick!!! I like the fact that the boy is turning a bit sadistic as well. :reddevil

Re: The Walking Dead!

Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:17 am
by A-R
http://m.newyorker.com/online/blogs/bac ... stern.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Great comparison in this article of TWD to Clint Eastwood's "Unforgiven" - both transcended their respective genres by giving their respective gunslinging heroes a tortured soul

Re: The Walking Dead!

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 1:45 pm
by knotquiteawake
another good episode, finally covering some new ground!

Thoughts that come to mind: Captain hook, preserved heads from futurama (the cartoon), and also what the heck is up with wearing your holster on the weak side for a very very long cross draw? It doesn't even look cool or tough, it just looked stupid.

Re: The Walking Dead!

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 2:12 pm
by 03Lightningrocks
knotquiteawake wrote:another good episode, finally covering some new ground!

Thoughts that come to mind: Captain hook, preserved heads from futurama (the cartoon), and also what the heck is up with wearing your holster on the weak side for a very very long cross draw? It doesn't even look cool or tough, it just looked stupid.

:iagree: :iagree: :iagree:

Re: The Walking Dead!

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 2:33 pm
by A-R
Anyone else notice The Governor shot that guy running away at about 100 yards using an M4/AR-15 with NO REAR SIGHT ?

"rlol"

Re: The Walking Dead!

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:02 pm
by 03Lightningrocks
I made the decision a few seasons ago to try my best to ignore the fifty shot revolvers and one thousand round machine guns...LOL. Now we have no sights and the weirdest form of carry I have yet to witness. I am driven buggy by watching ricks Colt Python swinging away from his body as he walks around. You would think that thing would snag on a passing zombie. LOL.

Re: The Walking Dead!

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:17 pm
by knotquiteawake
03Lightningrocks wrote:I made the decision a few seasons ago to try my best to ignore the fifty shot revolvers and one thousand round machine guns...LOL. Now we have no sights and the weirdest form of carry I have yet to witness. I am driven buggy by watching ricks Colt Python swinging away from his body as he walks around. You would think that thing would snag on a passing zombie. LOL.
Next thing you know they'll be fixing neon green bayonet knives to their pistols...

Re: The Walking Dead!

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:19 pm
by knotquiteawake
This is what was running through my mind at the end of the episode:
Image
ooooh, so thats how that process got started.

Re: The Walking Dead!

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:20 pm
by SRH78
A-R wrote:Anyone else notice The Governor shot that guy running away at about 100 yards using an M4/AR-15 with NO REAR SIGHT ?

"rlol"
Oh yes! I almost fell off the couch.

Re: The Walking Dead!

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 3:26 pm
by 03Lightningrocks
knotquiteawake wrote:This is what was running through my mind at the end of the episode:
[ Image ]
ooooh, so thats how that process got started.

So True!!!

Re: The Walking Dead!

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:14 pm
by gregthehand
So I guess he killed those soldiers because he wanted their gear but not them?

Re: The Walking Dead!

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:43 pm
by Scott in Houston
gregthehand wrote:So I guess he killed those soldiers because he wanted their gear but not them?

Yes. More stuff, less mouths to feed than if he took them in.

Re: The Walking Dead!

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 10:17 pm
by terryg
Scott in Houston wrote:
gregthehand wrote:So I guess he killed those soldiers because he wanted their gear but not them?
Yes. More stuff, less mouths to feed than if he took them in.
And I suspect he may have been worried about soldiers challenging his leadership ... or as others might say:

Image

Re: The Walking Dead!

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:43 am
by knotquiteawake
Scott in Houston wrote:
gregthehand wrote:So I guess he killed those soldiers because he wanted their gear but not them?

Yes. More stuff, less mouths to feed than if he took them in.
Also, they were clearly people who would not respect a leader who uses their holster backwards. So they had to go.