Page 1 of 1

Stun gun ineffective in self defense

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 8:28 am
by seamusTX
An Atlanta man tried to use a stun gun to defend himself against a carjacker and was shot five times. The victim crashed his vehicle after being shot, and the carjacker got away. The victim is expected to survive.

Money quote from police officer:
"Make the situation safe for you. You know you have to get away from that person. Just try to give the car up."
http://www.11alive.com/news/article_new ... yid=106124

- Jim

Re: Stun gun ineffective in self defense

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 8:52 am
by txinvestigator
seamusTX wrote:An Atlanta man tried to use a stun gun to defend himself against a carjacker and was shot five times. The victim crashed his vehicle after being shot, and the carjacker got away. The victim is expected to survive.

Money quote from police officer:
"Make the situation safe for you. You know you have to get away from that person. Just try to give the car up."
http://www.11alive.com/news/article_new ... yid=106124

- Jim
Stun Guns are different than TASERs. They tend to be inneffective. That said, it is foolish to attempt to use a Stun Gun, TASER, OC, etc, against a man wielding a gun.

In this situation, the best thing to do would have been to bail from the vehicle. Persons (me, in this case) over property.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 9:11 am
by seamusTX
I agree that a non-lethal weapon is not a good choice for an assailant who has a firearms at the ready.

If the driver in this case had locked his doors, the entire situation probably wouldn't have happened.

- Jim

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:01 am
by dukalmighty
That is why i carry because in that situation he woulda been shocked when i filled him fulla lead,and i guess i should probably lock my doors after getting in but i never think about it,time to change a habit and lock my doors during travel to prevent unwanted guests from jumping in

Re: Stun gun ineffective in self defense

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:38 am
by GrillKing
txinvestigator wrote:Persons (me, in this case) over property.
:iagree: 100% of the time.