Page 1 of 1
Extractor question
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 10:58 pm
by longtooth
I learn a lot while reading the trade dialog between buyers & sellers on the gun forums. Question. Many times when Kimbers are on the block the question will be asked if it has an internal or external extractor. What are the pros & cons? Which is better? Thanks in advance.
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 11:47 pm
by HighVelocity
Now you've done it...
There are strong opinions on both sides of the internal vs. external debate.
All I can say is that I had a bad experience with a Stainless Kimber Ultra Carry that had the external extractor. I sent it back to Kimber more than once and it still had occasional extraction failures. Not acceptable for a carry gun.
I now have one with an internal extractor and haven't had a single malfunction.
If you go to
http://www.1911forum.com and check out the Kimber forum you'll see thread after thread of folks talking about extractors.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 6:31 am
by longtooth
Thanks & I will. To me, worth about half of the 2cents I claim, the external would seem a little easier to fail. I will read a lot tonight.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:12 am
by flintknapper
HighVelocity wrote:Now you've done it...
There are strong opinions on both sides of the internal vs. external debate.
.
YUP!
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 3:53 pm
by longtooth
I figured there were strong opinions but guy so far all I have seen is worms. I asked for answers. You 2 wouldn't be avoiding the Q would you

just to keep from

I'll check back later.

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 4:42 pm
by KinnyLee
I've read alot about Kimber's external extractors failing. That's why I only have one Kimber and the rest are Springfield Armory. Not that my Kimber has given me any problems, but I don't want to be one of those statistics. lol.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 6:30 pm
by flintknapper
longtooth wrote:. You 2 wouldn't be avoiding the Q would you

just to keep from

I'll check back later.

YUP!
Naw,
I've heard good and bad things. I believe there has been enough posted on other sites to suggest that Kimber may have had some quality issues (external extractors out of spec.), for a period of time.
Others, think the design itself is problematic. If I had one that wasn't giving me any problems, then I would just keep it clean, keep good springs in it, and not worry.
Basically, for a carry gun...if it won't give me 200-250 failure free rounds (before cleaning), then I won't carry it...regardless of make or reputation.
Any pistol can fail. If someone has "proven" that the external extractors are likely to give you a problem at some point, I am not aware of it.
I had to tune the internal extractor on my Para when it was new, so they are not immune either. In fact, I replaced it with a Wilson Bullet Proof later, just because it was sturdier built. That was ten years (and countless thousands of rounds) ago. No bobbles yet!
Kimber makes an excellent 1911. If yours does not give you any problems...you've got a keeper.
Whew......., all that and you still don't have an answer.

Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 9:43 pm
by Kalrog
Coke or Pepsi?
Properly done, they both work. Improperly done, they can both fail.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:21 pm
by carlson1
OK I will bite

I have the Kimber with the the external extractor and never had a problem. I carry the Colt Commander and I have never had a problem with it either. I personally like the internal best for whatever it is worth.
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:50 pm
by RPBrown
--------
kalrog wrote------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coke or Pepsi?
Properly done, they both work. Improperly done, they can both fail.
Crown and Pepsi? Yuk!!
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:06 am
by longtooth
Thanks guys. The itch has been scratched but for sure I will read all additional comments.
