TexasCHLforum.com

This long article is a history of federal firearms laws: http://www.guncite.com/journals/hardfopa.html

I did not know, before I read it, that the bill that became the National Firearms Act of 1934 originally included all concealable firearms, including all handguns. The perception was that these weapons were suitable for criminal use and not so much for legitimate purposes.

The handgun part was amended out, but short-barrel rifles and shotguns remained, also with "any other weapons."

That was a near disaster. The $200 excise tax in 1934 was approximately equivalent to half a year's pay for a laborer. Combined with the requirement of local law enforcement approval, it would have been a virtual ban on handguns in many places.

This site contains some interesting, little-known history. Among other "anti-crime" measures, felons would have been prohibited from traveling in a motor vehicle, and internal passports would have been required for everyone for interstate travel.

- Jim

I'm surprised to see just how close we got to losing a tremendous amount of our liberties, all before most of us were even born. It really brings home to me the message that future generations may be counting on us to preserve and enhance their own liberties.

I also find the timeframe here interesting. 1934 was right as prohibition was ending. The crime lords who prospered under prohibition were now turning their efforts onto other kinds of crime. Based on this history, I would predict that if/when the US ends its "War on Drugs", all the drug lords will do the same thing, turning to other kinds of organized crime, thus renewing attempts to control crime through senseless laws and restrictions.

Yeah, the NFA was stimulated by a series of alarming robberies and massacres by the likes of Bonnie and Clyde. The article also notes that the end of Prohibition threatened to put a lot of federal agents and local police out of work during the Depression, and they needed something else to do.

- Jim

Read the US v. Miller case details, it makes no sense to me. It would seem that they were trying to loose the arguement.

Another item of interest, there's only been two murders with NFA firearms since 1934 and one of the murders was committed by a police officer.

Here's DAve Hardy's recent post. It's on DC Vs Heller
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/guest/ ... 7151.shtml

seamusTX wrote:I did not know, before I read it, that the bill that became the National Firearms Act of 1934 originally included all concealable firearms, including all handguns. The perception was that these weapons were suitable for criminal use and not so much for legitimate purposes.

- Jim

Half a world away, another regime was doing the same thing.
Yet here at home the "papers, please" was being looked at as "for your protection" nanny-ism.

it's that old hypocritical thing, "You can't do that over there!!!" but it's okay if I do it....