Changing uppers from to a "flat top"
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:22 pm
I picked up a used Bushmaster AR15 recently, but it's the type with the permanently attached carry handle (A2?). It came with a low quality scope on a low quality carry handle mount, which I wish to replace. After looking at scope mounting options, it's become painfully obvious that a "flat top" upper reciever is a much better solution for optics mounting.
So... I'm thinking about replacing the upper with another flat-top receiver. I'd like to stay with a recognized upper manufacturer, such as CMMG.
My understanding is that either of these would basically be quick replacement onto my existing AR-15's upper?
The "16" M4 upper" from http://www.fireforeffect.biz/shop/index ... t=3&shop=1&
or
http://www.aimsurplus.com/acatalog/CMMG ... _Half.html
While this is seems like an expensive solution, I think I'll be happer with this setup than trying to get a decent mount on my carry handle, and I'll be halfway (just short a completed lower receiver!) to another AR.
Any comments or suggestions? Is the 1/7 vs 1/9 twist and 4140 vs 4150 steel used in the above two receievers worth the $50 difference in price?
So... I'm thinking about replacing the upper with another flat-top receiver. I'd like to stay with a recognized upper manufacturer, such as CMMG.
My understanding is that either of these would basically be quick replacement onto my existing AR-15's upper?
The "16" M4 upper" from http://www.fireforeffect.biz/shop/index ... t=3&shop=1&
or
http://www.aimsurplus.com/acatalog/CMMG ... _Half.html
While this is seems like an expensive solution, I think I'll be happer with this setup than trying to get a decent mount on my carry handle, and I'll be halfway (just short a completed lower receiver!) to another AR.

Any comments or suggestions? Is the 1/7 vs 1/9 twist and 4140 vs 4150 steel used in the above two receievers worth the $50 difference in price?