TexasCHLforum.com

The NRA has intervened in the lawsuit filed by the Brady Campaign in an attempt to reverse the new National Park Rule on concealed firearms. Apparently, Sarah is a bit upset by our pleadings that accurately point out the Brady Campaign fraud.
http://www.bradynetwork.org/site/Messag ... v_id=31661" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Chas.

What was said that sparked such "outrage" from her?

Purplehood wrote:What was said that sparked such "outrage" from her?

I haven't seen our pleadings, but based upon her lies, I'm sure we are attacking the Brady Campaign's standing. She's also probably worried that our pleadings raise issues that could cause them IRS problems, but that's highly unlikely in an Obama administration.

Chas.

Jeez, she's a whiny so-and-so.

You know, I can understand many people who fight against my beliefs on many issues. I can understand why people would fight to ban abortion, for instance. I might not agree with them, but I respect where they are coming from.

Real, antigunners though, I don't really understand; and I can say this because I was one.
People who are against guns are WRONG. There really isn't "the other sides thinking" here, because the other side is 100%, truely and demonstratably wrong.

And I can say that because I was an anti gunner, who actually saw reality.

Not only is it wrong from a "guns are dangerous and kill people ban them OMG!" standpoint, trying to force the federal government to usurp states rights to set rules in an area where it clearly doesn't belong is also wrong. You seriously have to admit that national parks and other federally administered land (outside of military bases, and other places with a real, demonstarted security interest) have no business usurping the states laws on firearms. If the NRA pushed the bill as the bradys described it, (i.e. allowing carry in ANY NATIONAL PARK) it'd be just as wrong.

(off soapbox)

Did no one tell her that people are already concealed carrying on the streets? You'd think in a park it'd be safer, less 3rd parties to hit...

Go on, Sarah, fight it and fight it hard. The harder you fight, the more of the truth will come out.

I like how the article touts the only solution to their problem is to contribute money to the Brady Campaign. There's not even a call to write legislators or show any kind of support other than simply giving money. There are SIX links to click to donate on a web page that requires no scrolling to view its entirety (on my laptop screen, at least), yet not even one mention that support can be made in any other fashion. In fact, every link except the "sign up on our list" link on the page directs you to a donation form. It looks so very much like a common internet money scam.

Purplehood wrote:What was said that sparked such "outrage" from her?

I think a black person was drinking from her water fountain.

Can anyone say Holder???

Goooooood...