Page 1 of 1
NM: Restaurant carry bill moving forward
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 11:43 am
by seamusTX
Bills that would allow concealed-carry license holders to carry legally in restaurants that serve alcohol have moved toward passage in the House and Senate:
http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?ID=4570" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
At present, all places where alcohol is sold for consumption on-premises are off-limits. If signed into law, these bills would restore an aspect of the right to carry that most other states have had for decades.
- Jim
Re: NM: Restaurant carry bill moving forward
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 8:03 am
by bdickens
Isn't New Mexico one of those fabulous open-carry states?
Re: NM: Restaurant carry bill moving forward
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 10:37 am
by Liberty
One can open carry there pretty easily I wouldn't do it in Albuquerque or Santa Fe. The New Mexico CHL Laws are still undergoing a lot of tweaking
Re: NM: Restaurant carry bill moving forward
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2009 11:16 am
by KD5NRH
bdickens wrote:Isn't New Mexico one of those fabulous open-carry states?
Yup, and going out to smoke with a PT-99 carried openly really quiets down the gangbanger wanna-bes on your end of the motel, too.
Re: NM: Restaurant carry bill moving forward
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:01 pm
by jack010203
mmmmmmm open carry

hopefully someday down here
Re: NM: Restaurant carry bill moving forward
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:40 am
by bdickens
You both missed the point.
New Mexico is one of those wonderful open-carry meccas that Texas needs to be like, right? But I can't carry in a restaraunt there. But here in backwards, repressive, anti-gun Texas I can although the gun has to be concealed.
Which is better?
Re: NM: Restaurant carry bill moving forward
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:58 am
by seamusTX
Nearly all states have some sort of illogical restrictions. I think New Hampshire is the only state that allows licensed concealed carry in bars. You just have to take your pick or get the law changed.
BTW, AFAICT, this bill did not get to the floor of the Arizona House before the session ended.
- Jim
Re: NM: Restaurant carry bill moving forward
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:04 pm
by Captain Matt
bdickens wrote:You both missed the point.
The point that a legislator in NM proposed a bill to fix the problem?
Re: NM: Restaurant carry bill moving forward
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:10 pm
by seamusTX
I think his point was that open carry isn't worth much if the state puts a lot of places off-limits.
But here's a great idea: Let's not have another flame war about open carry. Everything that can be said has been said, multiple times.
- Jim
Re: NM: Restaurant carry bill moving forward
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:11 pm
by nitrogen
Arizona had the same silly restriction when I lived there, too. Hopefulyl they get it fixed, too, if they havn't already.
And yeah, Open Carry in NM is much more tolerated, even in ABQ than in PHX or Tucson, at least when I was last there a few years ago. I have to say I really enjoy open carry, but not enough to threaten what we already have.
Getting concealed carry fixed I think is the right priority first; then tilt after windmills :)
Re: NM: Restaurant carry bill moving forward
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:15 pm
by Captain Matt
I think it's great when legislators try to remove restrictions on civil rights. I cheer the people who got this moving in NM even it failed. I jeer the schadenfreude.
Re: NM: Restaurant carry bill moving forward
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:23 pm
by DoubleJ
nitrogen wrote:Arizona had the same silly restriction when I lived there, too. Hopefulyl they get it fixed, too, if they havn't already.
They have not....

Re: NM: Restaurant carry bill moving forward
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:35 pm
by frazzled
bdickens wrote:You both missed the point.
New Mexico is one of those wonderful open-carry meccas that Texas needs to be like, right? But I can't carry in a restaraunt there. But here in backwards, repressive, anti-gun Texas I can although the gun has to be concealed.
Which is better?
Good point.
