Any test cases for 30.06 site where CHL could have helped?
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:37 am
It is disturbing to us when we have to leave our gun(s) in the car before we enter
a 30.06 posted site.
Is anyone aware of any test cases in Texas (or any other state?) where a site was
posted 30.06, a crime happened, and the CHL sued the 30.06 posting entity since
the CHL was not allowed to defend himself/herself adequately?
The recent posting of Great Wolf Lodge in Grapevine, TX got me to thinking about
this. If the GWL thinks they will avoid some kind of liability by keeping CHL's out,
what if their posting makes them a big fat bullseye for bad guys who now know that
it's a gun free zone?
Should a robbery occur on their property now, it seems like someone could make this a
test case of how CHL's should never have been prevented from being able to protect
themselves and others.
SIA
a 30.06 posted site.
Is anyone aware of any test cases in Texas (or any other state?) where a site was
posted 30.06, a crime happened, and the CHL sued the 30.06 posting entity since
the CHL was not allowed to defend himself/herself adequately?
The recent posting of Great Wolf Lodge in Grapevine, TX got me to thinking about
this. If the GWL thinks they will avoid some kind of liability by keeping CHL's out,
what if their posting makes them a big fat bullseye for bad guys who now know that
it's a gun free zone?
Should a robbery occur on their property now, it seems like someone could make this a
test case of how CHL's should never have been prevented from being able to protect
themselves and others.
SIA