Page 1 of 1
New Rules
Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:44 pm
by lrb111
I got my notification letter to go to Austin for the instructor's training.
First the class is listed as 4 days. 7 th thru the 10th
The gun rules are different than the old rules for a CHL. SA are to be no less than 9mm, and revolvers are to be no less than 38.
I thought it odd that my notification was on 7/7 and my wife's letter has not arrived. Maybe they are replying to the applicants in the order recieved. Since, her's was sent in some time after mine.
Re: New Rules
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 12:10 pm
by cxm
Nothing new about the calibre requirements... been that way a long time... would you believe they would not let me use my 8 3/8" M16 S&W .32 revolver
As to the length, maybe they arer going to 10 hour days... OTOH, we had that anyway when I took the initial course....for five days....
Oh well...
V/r
Chuck
lrb111 wrote:I got my notification letter to go to Austin for the instructor's training.
First the class is listed as 4 days. 7 th thru the 10th
The gun rules are different than the old rules for a CHL. SA are to be no less than 9mm, and revolvers are to be no less than 38.
I thought it odd that my notification was on 7/7 and my wife's letter has not arrived. Maybe they are replying to the applicants in the order recieved. Since, her's was sent in some time after mine.
Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 3:34 pm
by lrb111
I as wondering if that was the case on calibers. and i was looking for a .32 like that
Since the paperwork says 4 days, I'm not sure if that's inclusive of the proficiency tests or not. I'm still wondering if they are on the 5th day.
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:58 pm
by ElGato
My Daughter, Tami, will be in that class but hasn't recieved her letter yet either.
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 10:37 pm
by lrb111
ElGato wrote:My Daughter, Tami, will be in that class but hasn't recieved her letter yet either.
Thank You. My wife emailed Austin, and Marion Stahl answered (overnight) that she is good to go to the class.
Do you expect Tami to teach with you?
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:21 am
by ElGato
Tami is going to teach with me, those long days are getting harder to do, it will be nice to get a break or two in the day.
a 4 day class?
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:28 pm
by switch
Are you already teaching pistol classes? Then you only have to take a 28 hour CHL instructor class, you can skip the classes on lesson plans.
There was a mix up in drafting the legislation. They lowered the caliber required for a CHL class to .32 (to allow the new Keltecs?) but forgot to include the instructors. :(
Re: a 4 day class?
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 9:51 am
by lrb111
switch wrote:Are you already teaching pistol classes? Then you only have to take a 28 hour CHL instructor class, you can skip the classes on lesson plans.
No, I'm not curently teaching. I didn't know that part of the class was on lesson plans. So, for me, that is welcome news.
There was a mix up in drafting the legislation. They lowered the caliber required for a CHL class to .32 (to allow the new Keltecs?) but forgot to include the instructors. :(
There's humor in there somewhere. I saw a Dan Wesson .357 revolver the other day for steel silouette shooting. It has the 10" barrel. I wonder how shooting that, for proficiency, with some light .38 special loads would go over?

8" barrell?
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 3:18 pm
by switch
Probably go over well. I used my S&W 500 w/8 3/4" barrel when my wife and I requalified last time.
Star said they had had .454 Casauls on the range before but mine was the first .50 magnum.

Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 12:56 pm
by lrb111
Well, we were informed in this year's class that the .32 will be allowed for instructors. Starting with next year's renewals. oh well...
Instroctors can qualify w/.32?
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:13 pm
by switch
That's news to me. I understand the legislature was sloppy when they changed the requirements for students and did not include instructors. Have not looked at the law, so I am not sure.
Posted: Mon Aug 14, 2006 8:30 pm
by lrb111
The way it was brought up and presented to us, gave the impression that it was a done deal. It sounded like an in house decision by the powers at DPS.
I was going to ask about the .380 for the S-A, but forgot, as the topic of discussion drifted farther.
edit: Duh, 32 for both possibly.