A Favor por favor
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:06 am
I've been a member here almost since the beginning, way before I was in LE. I was a spunky college kid and got a CHL and found this forum. I've learned and shared tons in the years past with members of this site. I've bought, sold, and traded guns, I've done shooting, heck I even got advice on getting into LE. I've been hit or miss since then, but anyway...now I work full time as a Local LEO in my city. I've seen a surge in posts, and caught up on ones I've missed, where people come and say some story of mistreatment by the police and "I didn't do anything wrong" and how the officer was a big jerk.
I make no excuses for cops who are jerks. There is no excuse for cops to be discourteous to the general public. I try and be polite to everyone I meet as long as I possibly can. Most of the people I know in my profession are the same.
That said - I have been reading stories from people about some incident they had with the police. I have to ask: Can we try to remember that there are two sides to every story? I know first-hand many of you to be pro LE, and I try to remain as normal and non-cop as possible in my daily life so as to not lose touch with reality. If people at church small groups ask what I do, I usually say work for the city or sanitation department. Often times, in reading stories like this, if one looks into it further they find out that the police officers involved were well reasonable actions based on the persons behavior and or commentary. Unfortunately I see many posts jumping to support the OP of such threads saying "that cop is out of line" or how he should be fired, etc, judging the incident from just one side.
An extreme example of this is granny getting tasered. I'm not saying I would've done it, but initially "she didn't do anything" and the deputy tasered her for no reason. Later we see a video of her cussing and pushing the officer while be warned the whole time (again don't want to debate the action - just highlighting the difference in accounts). Another one (which prompted this posting) is the guy that was at the movies and his girlfriend was crying in his lap. Many of you later caught on the guy was probably not completely honest in his assesment of the situation.
It is hard to gauge a situation when we aren't there. People will regularly call in complaints against officers at my department, accusing all sorts of things. When the Sgts pull the tapes (automatically network download when the car is parked at PD) and review the stop, they can see what really happened. Often times it is the person contacted that has a poor attitude and making excuses/berating the officer.
I'm not asking for us to not hold our LEOs accountable for poor attitudes and mistreatment of citizens. Please don't hear me saying that. I'm all for accountability and criticism. I would just to garner a benefit of doubt when someone is recounting their story of how "these cops ambushed me for no reason whatsoever."
To those of you that have experienced a negative contact from an LEO - I sincerely apologize. I in no way condone his/her actions and continue to work to improve the public's perception of my field.
To put this post in context, picture us having a beer, or playing cards, shooting some clays, or something fun...not heavy and critical.
Regards,
GigAg04
I make no excuses for cops who are jerks. There is no excuse for cops to be discourteous to the general public. I try and be polite to everyone I meet as long as I possibly can. Most of the people I know in my profession are the same.
That said - I have been reading stories from people about some incident they had with the police. I have to ask: Can we try to remember that there are two sides to every story? I know first-hand many of you to be pro LE, and I try to remain as normal and non-cop as possible in my daily life so as to not lose touch with reality. If people at church small groups ask what I do, I usually say work for the city or sanitation department. Often times, in reading stories like this, if one looks into it further they find out that the police officers involved were well reasonable actions based on the persons behavior and or commentary. Unfortunately I see many posts jumping to support the OP of such threads saying "that cop is out of line" or how he should be fired, etc, judging the incident from just one side.
An extreme example of this is granny getting tasered. I'm not saying I would've done it, but initially "she didn't do anything" and the deputy tasered her for no reason. Later we see a video of her cussing and pushing the officer while be warned the whole time (again don't want to debate the action - just highlighting the difference in accounts). Another one (which prompted this posting) is the guy that was at the movies and his girlfriend was crying in his lap. Many of you later caught on the guy was probably not completely honest in his assesment of the situation.
It is hard to gauge a situation when we aren't there. People will regularly call in complaints against officers at my department, accusing all sorts of things. When the Sgts pull the tapes (automatically network download when the car is parked at PD) and review the stop, they can see what really happened. Often times it is the person contacted that has a poor attitude and making excuses/berating the officer.
I'm not asking for us to not hold our LEOs accountable for poor attitudes and mistreatment of citizens. Please don't hear me saying that. I'm all for accountability and criticism. I would just to garner a benefit of doubt when someone is recounting their story of how "these cops ambushed me for no reason whatsoever."
To those of you that have experienced a negative contact from an LEO - I sincerely apologize. I in no way condone his/her actions and continue to work to improve the public's perception of my field.
To put this post in context, picture us having a beer, or playing cards, shooting some clays, or something fun...not heavy and critical.
Regards,
GigAg04