Custer flag to be sold by DIA
Posted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:52 pm
http://www.freep.com/article/20100625/E ... old-by-DIA" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
This Michigan "hero" slaughtered innocent women and children and elders at Washita. Custer got what was coming to him. Sadly, he didn't get it soon enough. IMO, Custer stands as a repugnant blemish on all that is good about the USA. It's a pity that he took the 7th Cavalry with him.“This is Michigan and this is Custer, one of the greatest heroes Michigan has produced...
Not all perished...Oldgringo wrote:It's a pity that he took the 7th Cavalry with him.
If the reference is to the patch on the shoulder in the picture, that's the 7th Infantry Division, not the 7th Cavalry regiment. I served in the 7th ID for 3 tours, two in Korea and one in the States. The 7th Cavalry Regiment is now part of 4 different Infantry Divisions. Squadrons of the 7th Cav. serve with the 1st Cav Div, 2d ID, and the 3d ID. There are 5 squadrons of the 7th Cav in total today.bronco78 wrote:Not all perished...Oldgringo wrote:It's a pity that he took the 7th Cavalry with him.
Though only a historical unit descendent.. The 7th, still has members alive, kicking.. AND serving the Nation.
As for his reported transgressions.. I’ll leave that to the Historians.. I was not there. (I aint THAT old)
OK cool. That's why I said IF the reference was to the patch. Just didn't want the two to be confused. Both units have highly distinguished records. My Cav days were spent in the 2/10 Cav as part of the 7th ID.bronco78 wrote:Sorry, inside joke... Yes I'm aware of all of that. I was in 7th ID from 1988 to 1992, Now at Hood , having served in 1-7, 2-5 and finally 1CD HQ
1-7 CAV as part of 1st BCT, 1CD is in lineage to Custer’s 7th.
In closing,, it was the guy wearing the 7th ID patch, not the patch.
He doesn't call himself Oldgringo for nothing.bronco78 wrote:As for his reported transgressions.. I’ll leave that to the Historians.. I was not there. (I aint THAT old)
He still didn't take all of the 7th with him, my great grandfather John Sylvanus Loud was an officer in the 7th later.Oldgringo wrote:This Michigan "hero" slaughtered innocent women and children and elders at Washita. Custer got what was coming to him. Sadly, he didn't get it soon enough. IMO, Custer stands as a repugnant blemish on all that is good about the USA. It's a pity that he took the 7th Cavalry with him.“This is Michigan and this is Custer, one of the greatest heroes Michigan has produced...
In addition to Big Medicine and the other Crow scouts that Custer arrogantly dismissed, I recall (?) there was a 7th Cavalry horse named "Commanche" that survived Custer's last folly. BTW, one of my favorite movies of all time, Little Big Man, had passages on the events leading up to the battle of the Greasy Grass (Little Big Horn).jimlongley wrote:He still didn't take all of the 7th with him, my great grandfather John Sylvanus Loud was an officer in the 7th later.Oldgringo wrote:This Michigan "hero" slaughtered innocent women and children and elders at Washita. Custer got what was coming to him. Sadly, he didn't get it soon enough. IMO, Custer stands as a repugnant blemish on all that is good about the USA. It's a pity that he took the 7th Cavalry with him.“This is Michigan and this is Custer, one of the greatest heroes Michigan has produced...
Yes, Custer was not alone out there, there was a much larger force not far away, and it is quite likely that events would reached a much different conclusion if Custer had done what he was supposed to.J.R.@A&M wrote:I'm not qualified to judge Custer's tactics. Some authors suggest he erred tactically by dividing his command prior to the attack. Benteen thought so, and said so afterwards. But Benteen also disliked Custer, so not exactly an unbiased viewpoint.
My armchair reading paints a picture of Custer as being callous and uncaring about his enlisted men (if true, that doesn't endear him to me).
I think Custer deserves harshest criticism if, as has also been suggested, he pushed to attack the village in order to win personal/political glory (again, at the ultimate expense of his men). As I understand it, his orders were to keep the Indians from escaping to the south, and to drive them towards Terry's advancing infantry.