TexasCHLforum.com

Is Senator Hinojosa still believed to be one of the holdouts on sending SB 354 (campus carry) to the floor for a vote?

If so, then the man is a HYPOCRITE because he is listed as one of the co-sponsors of SB 905 that exempts lawmakers from PC 46.035 unlawful carry by a license holder.

Maybe he thinks SB 905 will make it OK for him to carry a gun on a plane ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Hinojosa" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I think we all need to call, email, and fax the senator and tell him that if he supports SB 905 for himself then he needs to support SB 354 and SB 321 (parking lots) for the rest of us.

Charles is probably better informed about this that I am, but it appears he is. He has been listening to his constiuents, or so his staff says. My thought is the Woodheads are randomly picking addresses out of his district from which to contact him, or not telling the staff at all.
He alo has his CHL.
Call his staff, fax, and email.

Chuy voter SB 905 out of committee yesterday.

HYPOCRITE!

Maybe politely call his staff and ask what's the difference between those state employees and others, such as professors.

There's always a double standard with politicians. I'm not a fan...you just take the lesser of two evils with any of them.

The lesser of two evils is not always the devil you know.

They get to vote now. We get to vote in November.

Jasonw560 wrote:He has been listening to his constiuents, or so his staff says.

Thats what they told me, I said that I was one of his constituents, and that it was my opinion that if he voted for this bill the type of constituents that oppose it were unlikely to vote against him in the next election, however if he votes against it myself and this bills supporters are the type of people that would make sure to vote against him.

O.F.Fascist wrote:

Jasonw560 wrote:He has been listening to his constiuents, or so his staff says.

Thats what they told me, I said that I was one of his constituents, and that it was my opinion that if he voted for this bill the type of constituents that oppose it were unlikely to vote against him in the next election, however if he votes against it myself and this bills supporters are the type of people that would make sure to vote against him.

Good logical response imho

RPB wrote:

O.F.Fascist wrote:

Jasonw560 wrote:He has been listening to his constiuents, or so his staff says.

Thats what they told me, I said that I was one of his constituents, and that it was my opinion that if he voted for this bill the type of constituents that oppose it were unlikely to vote against him in the next election, however if he votes against it myself and this bills supporters are the type of people that would make sure to vote against him.

Good logical response imho