speedsix wrote:...when I was in school (shortly after paper was invented)...
That was slightly before my time. I started high school just after the invention of the fountain pen.
And I gotta say that this new era of educator-as-bureaucrat, not teacher and mentor, ain't workin' out real well. I think it raises a big question-mark about the future of our country.
Now, I don't want to make an over-generalization. There are many teachers out there in the system who really do teach, whose life-calling is doing so and who dedicate their lives to it. And God bless 'em. But the vast public school systems certainly seem to no longer encourage those kinds of true teachers and mentors: it rewards neither teachers nor students who think for themselves. But doin' it "by the book" doesn't seem to be
teaching our kids as much as it should.
The
Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) is generally considered to be the most comprehensive comparison of its kind showing how students in different countries/economies are performing. It tests 15-year-olds only, and the results come out every three years. The
latest results were released in December 2010 from 2009 tests. In 2009, over 470,000 students in 65 countries took the tests. The tests focus on how well students are able to
apply knowledge in math, reading, and science to real-life problems.
The U.S. made some very small gains over the 2003 and 2006 numbers, but that upward trend isn't strong, and for a while now, our country's students haven't been able to display the educational achievements they should in order to keep this the leading world economy. Some example stats:
- In the 34 OECD countries tested in the 2009 PISA data, the U.S. ranked 14th in reading, 17th in science, and 25th in math.
- That puts us slightly above average in reading, exactly mediocre in science, and dismal in math.
- Outperforming U.S. students in all areas were students from Shanghai, South Korea, Finland, Hong Kong, Singapore, Canada, New Zealand, Japan, Australia, and others.
- Shanghai was the top overall performer in the 2009 tests. In reading, they scored 556 points compared to the U.S.'s 500; in math, 600 points compared to the U.S.'s 487.
- Between 1995 and 2008 the U.S. slipped from ranking 2nd in college graduation rates to 13th.
- Of the 34 OECD countries, only 8 have lower high school graduation rates than the U.S.
- Of the 34 OECD countries in the 2009 results, only Luxembourg's educational system costs more per student than the U.S.'s.
- Estonia and Poland performed at equivalent averages to the U.S., yet spend less than half what the U.S. does on a per-student basis.
In talking about the 2009 PISA results, I think OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria kinda nailed it when, in describing why the top-performing countries did so well when compared to mediocre and lower-performing countries, he said: "
They don't only produce children who know the matters by heart. They're educated to understand and face the challenges of real life.... That speaks about who is going to be leading tomorrow."
I think he's right.
Back around the time the fountain pen was invented

the focus was to teach students how to think, how to reason, and how to study. In short, we were taught how to
learn...not just how to memorize. The old "teach a man to fish" parable.
From what I've seen--and I'll admit that my firsthand experience is limited: I don't have any children in the current educational system--the system has become more bureaucratic than educational, concerned more with administrivia than teaching. It seems like the perfect student is expected to be one who doesn't think for himself, follows instructions without question, and can pass standardized tests with the least amount of actual effort on the part of the educational institution.
Admittedly, the public school system faces a rapidly growing alien population. I would say "minority" population, but the U.S. Census estimates the Latino "minority" will comprise more than half of the U.S. population in less than 40 years, so to me it's hard to say "minority" any longer: they're either Americans if here legally, or illegal aliens if not.
Unfortunately, the public school system hasn't figured out how to handle the influx of non-English-speaking, low-income, illegal aliens. Right now, the schools are trying to assimilate them but aren't doing it well, and as a result the average levels of achievement are being pulled down.
Gifted students in secondary public schools are, I think, finding it difficult to find things that challenge them, that allow them to grow. That's because most of the time and money and resources in the system are being expended trying to push the middle-of-the-bell-curve mass along like a cohesive clump toward the standardized tests that will allow them to move up to the next grade level.
Private schools and home schooling can't be the sole answer. Somehow, we have to figure out how public schools can get back to growing minds and leaders, not just producing barely-graduates who are ill-prepared for competitive university experiences and even more competitive workplace environments.
/rant off