What full auto would you consider and why?
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:34 pm
The title says it all. I am considering a purchase, and know there are many educated opinions here. 
TexasCHLforum.com
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
What full auto would you consider and why?
Page 1 of 4
Re: What full auto would you consider and why?
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:43 pm
Not that I want to purchase a full-auto model, nor can I afford one...but, with an M-16 you can get parts pretty easy it would seem, OR...with an AK-whatever, its so tough you'd have to do something insane to break it...just my .02 worth...
Re: What full auto would you consider and why?
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:44 pm
Too many to list. I think a RDIAS would be the most fun for the buck at the end of the day but I'd love to get a Thompson... and a BAR... list goes on.Re: What full auto would you consider and why?
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:47 pm
Ditto an M16 for the parts availabiity, or possibly a suppressed MP5.
Re: What full auto would you consider and why?
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:48 pm
Ma Duce - - - when you absolutely have to have the best!
Re: What full auto would you consider and why?
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2011 11:52 pm
I'm partial to the M-2 also. Unfortunately, between initial cost and ammo cost, the sound of brass hitting the ground is drowned out by the sucking sound of your retirement fund draining.MoJo wrote:Ma Duce - - - when you absolutely have to have the best!
Re: What full auto would you consider and why?
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:02 am
BAR
Re: What full auto would you consider and why?
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:04 am
HK MP 40 Wow, What a blast. Shot one as a kid. A bring back, illegal at that the time. Sweet.
Re: What full auto would you consider and why?
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:07 am
Several years ago, I had the pleasure of shooting an automatic integrally-suppressed Ruger 10/22. If the law changed, I would like something similar, because I could actually afford to shoot it. 
Re: What full auto would you consider and why?
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 12:07 am
M-2. Because if I bought one of those and the three boxcars of .50 BMG i would need to feed it the first couple months, it would mean I had just won both the Texas Lotto and the Powerball...
On a slightly smaller scale, I'd love to have a genuine Thompson.
On a slightly smaller scale, I'd love to have a genuine Thompson.
Re: What full auto would you consider and why?
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:51 am
Wow! There's some good one's there.
M2 would be nice and the BAR, but I've always thought a Tommy gun would be too cool.
M2 would be nice and the BAR, but I've always thought a Tommy gun would be too cool.
Re: What full auto would you consider and why?
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:05 am
Phalanx.
Re: What full auto would you consider and why?
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:25 am
On top of the squad car, right?gigag04 wrote:Phalanx.
Re: What full auto would you consider and why?
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:43 am
get a registered pack or sear for hk platform. You can shoot everything from 9mm to beltfeds. Buy clone pistols and stocks for them and you can have short barreled rifles without a tax stamp on it. (just remove the stock when the sear is in a different host). Plus much like an AR rdIAS you can run the piss out of it and still sell it for more later.
Re: What full auto would you consider and why?
Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2011 10:08 am
This would give you the most options.JeepGuy79 wrote:get a registered pack or sear for hk platform. You can shoot everything from 9mm to beltfeds. Buy clone pistols and stocks for them and you can have short barreled rifles without a tax stamp on it. (just remove the stock when the sear is in a different host). Plus much like an AR rdIAS you can run the piss out of it and still sell it for more later.
I've always thought an Uzi would be fun though.