TexasCHLforum.com

Article and poll Is it time to renew the Assault Weapons ban?

45%
no!

1%
leaning no

1%
leaning yes

54%
yes!


Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/post-giffor ... z1nt7HFqdp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

LOL article was from January 2011, people still posting comments today

188 votes, not exactly a scientific poll.

45% + 1% +1% +54% = 101%

I guess that makes it official.../sarcasm

Unless my math is wrong...

Does not matter as long as the Senate is Pro-Gun.

Beiruty wrote:Does not matter as long as the Senate is Pro-Gun.

I'd like to think that is the case buddy!

But with the way "The Idiot In Chief" signs Executive Orders (Illegally) anything is possible.

AEA wrote:

Beiruty wrote:Does not matter as long as the Senate is Pro-Gun.

I'd like to think that is the case buddy!

But the way "The Idiot In Chief" signs Executive Orders (Illegally) anything is possible.

I think your fingers slipped on the keyboard, and you really meant "commander".

Signing a executive order for ban on guns (limitation on civil liberty), will lead to a case immediately to the Supreme court of USA

Can the Prez ban books, or the internet in a stroke of a pen?

Beiruty wrote:Signing a executive order for ban on guns (limitation on civil liberty), will lead to a case immediately to the Supreme court of USA

Can the Prez ban books, or the internet in a stroke of a pen?

Unfortunately, "Immediately" and "SCOTUS" are a contradiction in terms. Terms that are also mutually exclusive.

Beiruty wrote:Signing a executive order for ban on guns (limitation on civil liberty), will lead to a case immediately to the Supreme court of USA

Can the Prez ban books, or the internet in a stroke of a pen?

I'm sure the president and others <cough cough...Pelosi, Feinstein> would love to try if they even remotely thought the could get away with it. The way things seem to be going they might get their chance.

Beiruty wrote:Can the Prez ban books, or the internet in a stroke of a pen?

Legally he cannot. Legally, he shouldn't even be President.
He has no concern for legality. Just look at what he lets his minions get away with. Look at the backdoor routines he has already done!

I'll make you a bet right here and right now.........
If he gets another 4 years I bet we WILL see some sort of weapons ban that we have not had in a long time.

Oldgringo wrote: Unfortunately, "Immediately" and "SCOTUS" are a contradiction in terms. Terms that are also mutually exclusive.

However, SCOTUS is not happy with him either after the snub he gave them in his first State of The Union Address to Joint Congress. I am hoping that will somehow come back to haunt him.

AEA wrote:

Oldgringo wrote: Unfortunately, "Immediately" and "SCOTUS" are a contradiction in terms. Terms that are also mutually exclusive.

However, SCOTUS is not happy with him either after the snub he gave them in his first State of The Union Address to Joint Congress. I am hoping that will somehow come back to haunt him.

Sister Ginsberg is gonna' hang up her droopy-drawers pretty shortly. The current POTUS will probably not appoint a Charleton Heston disiciple to that position, you think?

Exactly, plus another 2 in the next 5 years.

This is also a website dedicated to young, mostly liberal, idealists. I'm not surprised that the vote is nearly split. Even if the sampling were several thousand, it comes from a subset of all voters which isn't all that large.

I bet they can't even define what they want to ban.