Ham Radio?
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 2:30 pm
Anyone know where to buy a hand held locally? Preferably Arlington.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
There are a few hams on the forum who will probably offer some good advice picking out a rig. Most of the licensing info that you need is here: http://www.arrl.org/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;The Annoyed Man wrote:What a coincidence.....
I was actually going to post a thread asking what's involved in getting a Ham license. I've been thinking about picking up a couple of handhelds for my wife's and my go-bags, and I'm pretty sure that I don't want FRS simply because this is for when we are separated by some distance. I don't know if we'd be better served with handheld CBs or handheld Hams. I am a real novice at this stuff and don't know a thing.
Although FRS is limited in power, the primary limitation for most handhelds is line of sight distance. The way handhelds accomplish longer ranges is by using repeaters, and I'll bet that if the time comes that your go-bags are necessary, repeaters will be in short supply.The Annoyed Man wrote:What a coincidence.....
I was actually going to post a thread asking what's involved in getting a Ham license. I've been thinking about picking up a couple of handhelds for my wife's and my go-bags, and I'm pretty sure that I don't want FRS simply because this is for when we are separated by some distance. I don't know if we'd be better served with handheld CBs or handheld Hams. I am a real novice at this stuff and don't know a thing.
So for that application then, in a "repeaterless" world, is there any particular advantage to having a handheld CB over a handheld FRS radio?jimlongley wrote:Although FRS is limited in power, the primary limitation for most handhelds is line of sight distance. The way handhelds accomplish longer ranges is by using repeaters, and I'll bet that if the time comes that your go-bags are necessary, repeaters will be in short supply.The Annoyed Man wrote:What a coincidence.....
I was actually going to post a thread asking what's involved in getting a Ham license. I've been thinking about picking up a couple of handhelds for my wife's and my go-bags, and I'm pretty sure that I don't want FRS simply because this is for when we are separated by some distance. I don't know if we'd be better served with handheld CBs or handheld Hams. I am a real novice at this stuff and don't know a thing.
Especially open repeaters.jimlongley wrote:and I'll bet that if the time comes that your go-bags are necessary, repeaters will be in short supply.
The biggest problem with FRS is the 0.5W power limit. This limits the range significantly, typically less than a mile. The hybrids that are commonly found have both FRS and GMRS (5W power) channels, but the GMRS requires a ridiculously expensive license. Of course, in an emergency, the rules mean little.The Annoyed Man wrote:Sorry, I didn't mean to hijack this thread. I'll ask one more question then and let it go for now......So for that application then, in a "repeaterless" world, is there any particular advantage to having a handheld CB over a handheld FRS radio?jimlongley wrote:Although FRS is limited in power, the primary limitation for most handhelds is line of sight distance. The way handhelds accomplish longer ranges is by using repeaters, and I'll bet that if the time comes that your go-bags are necessary, repeaters will be in short supply.The Annoyed Man wrote:What a coincidence.....
I was actually going to post a thread asking what's involved in getting a Ham license. I've been thinking about picking up a couple of handhelds for my wife's and my go-bags, and I'm pretty sure that I don't want FRS simply because this is for when we are separated by some distance. I don't know if we'd be better served with handheld CBs or handheld Hams. I am a real novice at this stuff and don't know a thing.
That is a very hard question to answer. I have seen FRS radios that advertise a 20mile range. I doubt that range is really feasible in any but ideal conditions. I generally figure line of sight without interference. When traveling I found that some stores/companies use FRS for there in-store communications so there will be some interference. I use FRS radios when traveling in multiple vehicle convoys. The only thing I use a mounted mobile CB for is traffic and road conditions from the trucks but you have to listen to a bunch of foul crap sometimes.The Annoyed Man wrote:Sorry, I didn't mean to hijack this thread. I'll ask one more question then and let it go for now......So for that application then, in a "repeaterless" world, is there any particular advantage to having a handheld CB over a handheld FRS radio?jimlongley wrote:Although FRS is limited in power, the primary limitation for most handhelds is line of sight distance. The way handhelds accomplish longer ranges is by using repeaters, and I'll bet that if the time comes that your go-bags are necessary, repeaters will be in short supply.The Annoyed Man wrote:What a coincidence.....
I was actually going to post a thread asking what's involved in getting a Ham license. I've been thinking about picking up a couple of handhelds for my wife's and my go-bags, and I'm pretty sure that I don't want FRS simply because this is for when we are separated by some distance. I don't know if we'd be better served with handheld CBs or handheld Hams. I am a real novice at this stuff and don't know a thing.
2farnorth wrote:That is a very hard question to answer. I have seen FRS radios that advertise a 20mile range. I doubt that range is really feasible in any but ideal conditions. I generally figure line of sight without interference. When traveling I found that some stores/companies use FRS for there in-store communications so there will be some interference. I use FRS radios when traveling in multiple vehicle convoys. The only thing I use a mounted mobile CB for is traffic and road conditions from the trucks but you have to listen to a bunch of foul crap sometimes.The Annoyed Man wrote:Sorry, I didn't mean to hijack this thread. I'll ask one more question then and let it go for now......So for that application then, in a "repeaterless" world, is there any particular advantage to having a handheld CB over a handheld FRS radio?jimlongley wrote:Although FRS is limited in power, the primary limitation for most handhelds is line of sight distance. The way handhelds accomplish longer ranges is by using repeaters, and I'll bet that if the time comes that your go-bags are necessary, repeaters will be in short supply.The Annoyed Man wrote:What a coincidence.....
I was actually going to post a thread asking what's involved in getting a Ham license. I've been thinking about picking up a couple of handhelds for my wife's and my go-bags, and I'm pretty sure that I don't want FRS simply because this is for when we are separated by some distance. I don't know if we'd be better served with handheld CBs or handheld Hams. I am a real novice at this stuff and don't know a thing.
Handheld CB is a different matter. Under ideal conditions with a 4 watt radio, no skip, rubber "ducky" antenna, and flat terrain 1/2 to 1 mile transmit range. If hooked up to an external antenna the range will greatly improve to 1 - 5 miles. If the long distance "skip" is running (depends on sunspot activity/ionosphere conditions ) the noise level on the band gets very high from powerful signals coming from long distance effectively killing local communication beyond 1/4 -1/2 mile (with legal power CB).
Many Ham VHF/UHF repeaters have back up power available to keep them operating in power out conditions. This is fine as long as they can get fuel for the generators. Some do have solar power charged batteries but the out put power and use on the repeaters would be necessarily limited in emergency conditions. They many times have a PLL code restricted access which is one of the reasons I've kind of faded from the local ham circles. I haven't been willing to go out and buy new updated equipment to maintain my access. Most of my equipment now qualifies as antique. Getting a Technicians ham license is not that difficult. Would require some study of electronic theory and the rules manual, and take a test with a designated local examiners (usually local hams). That would give you operating privileges in a few of the local area bands that include many of the repeaters plus the 28mhz hf band which is close to the CB band. But the ham bands are generally more orderly and polite than the CB or FRS bands.
N5PNZ
2farnorth wrote: But the ham bands are generally more orderly and polite than the CB or FRS bands.
N5PNZ