TexasCHLforum.com

Keith B wrote:In relation to what? Can you be a little more specific?

Beiruty wrote:

Keith B wrote:In relation to what? Can you be a little more specific?

I am now a contractor working as Consultant for Western Digital. I have been in negotiation to be converted to Perm and work in Irvine, CA. That city is very beautiful, real estate is 4X-5X than that of Collin County, north of Dallas.
I refused to move to CA and main reason is CHL and my toys that would be allowed not to move with me.
Now, For the second time, I am now approached to work out of Longmont, CO. Said city seems nice and upscale. Real estate is maybe 1.5X than where I reside.

CHL: Shall issue state?
Any restrictions on Black guns, etc....

Keith B wrote:

Beiruty wrote:

Keith B wrote:In relation to what? Can you be a little more specific?

I am now a contractor working as Consultant for Western Digital. I have been in negotiation to be converted to Perm and work in Irvine, CA. That city is very beautiful, real estate is 4X-5X than that of Collin County, north of Dallas.
I refused to move to CA and main reason is CHL and my toys that would be allowed not to move with me.
Now, For the second time, I am now approached to work out of Longmont, CO. Said city seems nice and upscale. Real estate is maybe 1.5X than where I reside.

CHL: Shall issue state?
Any restrictions on Black guns, etc....

Concealed carry is fine, except they do NOT accept non-resident CHL's. So if you move, make sure to keep your residence as Texas until you get a Colorado CHL.

Colorado is open carry, except for Denver and Aurora, but would not recommend it in most populated or tourist areas.

Here is a good resource http://handgunlaw.us/states/colorado.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

discoqueen wrote:Read the CO laws very carefully. While TX has very specific wording and size requirements for 'no carry' signage, it's my understanding that even a "gunbuster" sign has force of law in CO.
I'm sure someone will correct me if I am mistaken.....

While we were out there in July, I didn't see a single person open carrying in the areas we visited.

C.R.S. 18-4-201 As used in this article, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) "Premises" means any real estate and all improvements erected thereon.
(2) "Separate building" means each unit of a building consisting of two or more units separately secured or occupied.
http://www.handgunlaw.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; 5
(3) A person "enters unlawfully" or "remains unlawfully" in or upon premises when the person is not licensed, invited, or otherwise privileged to do so. A person who, regardless of his or her intent, enters or remains in or upon premises that are at the time open to the public does so with license and privilege unless the person defies a lawful order not to enter or remain, personally communicated to him or her by the owner of the premises or some other authorized person. A license or privilege to enter or remain in a building that is only partly open to the public is not a license or privilege to enter or remain in that part of the building that is not open to the public. Except as is otherwise provided in section 33-6-116 (1), C.R.S., a person who enters or remains upon unimproved and apparently unused land that is neither fenced nor otherwise enclosed in a manner designed to exclude intruders does so with license and privilege unless notice against trespass is personally communicated to the person by the owner of the land or some other authorized person or unless notice forbidding entry is given by posting with signs at intervals of not more than four hundred forty yards or, if there is a readily identifiable entrance to the land, by posting with signs at such entrance to the private land or the forbidden part of the land. In the case of a designated access road not otherwise posted, said notice shall be posted at the entrance to private land and shall be substantially as follows: "ENTERING PRIVATE PROPERTYREMAIN ON ROADS". HISTORY: Source: L. 71: R&RE, p. 426, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 40-4-201.L. 75: (3) amended, p. 634, § 1, effective July 1.L. 84: (3) amended, p. 922, § 9, effective January 1, 1985.L. 99: (3) amended, p. 326, § 1, effective July 1. ANNOTATION "Open to the public" defined. "Open to the public" means premises which by their physical nature, function, custom, usage, notice or lack thereof, or other circumstances at the time would cause a reasonable person to believe no permission to enter or remain is required. People v. Bozeman, 624 P.2d 916 (Colo. App. 1980).

Keith B wrote:

discoqueen wrote:Read the CO laws very carefully. While TX has very specific wording and size requirements for 'no carry' signage, it's my understanding that even a "gunbuster" sign has force of law in CO.
I'm sure someone will correct me if I am mistaken.....

While we were out there in July, I didn't see a single person open carrying in the areas we visited.

This is incorrect. From http://www.handgunlaw.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

C.R.S. 18-4-201 As used in this article, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) "Premises" means any real estate and all improvements erected thereon.
(2) "Separate building" means each unit of a building consisting of two or more units separately secured or occupied.
http://www.handgunlaw.us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; 5
(3) A person "enters unlawfully" or "remains unlawfully" in or upon premises when the person is not licensed, invited, or otherwise privileged to do so. A person who, regardless of his or her intent, enters or remains in or upon premises that are at the time open to the public does so with license and privilege unless the person defies a lawful order not to enter or remain, personally communicated to him or her by the owner of the premises or some other authorized person. A license or privilege to enter or remain in a building that is only partly open to the public is not a license or privilege to enter or remain in that part of the building that is not open to the public. Except as is otherwise provided in section 33-6-116 (1), C.R.S., a person who enters or remains upon unimproved and apparently unused land that is neither fenced nor otherwise enclosed in a manner designed to exclude intruders does so with license and privilege unless notice against trespass is personally communicated to the person by the owner of the land or some other authorized person or unless notice forbidding entry is given by posting with signs at intervals of not more than four hundred forty yards or, if there is a readily identifiable entrance to the land, by posting with signs at such entrance to the private land or the forbidden part of the land. In the case of a designated access road not otherwise posted, said notice shall be posted at the entrance to private land and shall be substantially as follows: "ENTERING PRIVATE PROPERTYREMAIN ON ROADS". HISTORY: Source: L. 71: R&RE, p. 426, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 40-4-201.L. 75: (3) amended, p. 634, § 1, effective July 1.L. 84: (3) amended, p. 922, § 9, effective January 1, 1985.L. 99: (3) amended, p. 326, § 1, effective July 1. ANNOTATION "Open to the public" defined. "Open to the public" means premises which by their physical nature, function, custom, usage, notice or lack thereof, or other circumstances at the time would cause a reasonable person to believe no permission to enter or remain is required. People v. Bozeman, 624 P.2d 916 (Colo. App. 1980).

________________________________
From “No Firearm” signs in Colorado have no force of law unless they are posted on property that is specifically mentioned in State Law as being off limits to those with a Permit/License to Carry. If you are in a place not specifically mentioned in the law that is posted and they ask you to leave, you must leave. If you refuse to leave then you are breaking the law and can be charged. Even if the property is not posted and you are asked to leave you must leave. Always be aware of the possibility that responding Police Officers who may have been called without your knowledge and may not know the laws on trespass etc. could arrest you even if you are within the law.

Keith B wrote:I have never found a solid reference that says you legally can't carry in Aurora. However, it may definitely be the case of beat the rap, not the ride, especially after the movie theater shooting.