Page 1 of 1

Wide Receiver details from IG report

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:28 am
by Rex B
Local ATF operation only, Bush DOJ was not informed

http://pjmedia.com/blog/doj-inspector-g ... epage=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Wide Receiver details from IG report

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:20 pm
by RPB
Obama slammed on Fast and Furious in Spanish-language TV interview: Shouldn’t you ‘fire’ Holder? [VIDEO]
Published: 5:16 PM 09/20/2012
http://dailycaller.com/2012/09/20/obama ... ic-holder/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

This video is worth watching

Re: Wide Receiver details from IG report

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 1:45 pm
by StewNTexas
This will get worse. O-bozo is saying this was a program NOT started in Washington, but by the guys on site, he opens up another large problem for himself.

Presidential Privlege can only be claimed for matters pertaining only to the president or a very high official directly.

If he was not there or involved, and neither were his henchmen, privlege cannot be claimed.

Re: Wide Receiver details from IG report

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:01 pm
by Rex B
I think he is saying the Wide Receiver was a local effort.
Holder himself took credit for F&F at a speech in Mexico City in 2009

Re: Wide Receiver details from IG report

Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:45 pm
by fickman
Somehow this is Bush' fault, too, if you listen to him carefully.

I don't doubt that the investigation began years ago. . . but not the gunwalking. He's being purposefully vague and convenient.

Re: Wide Receiver details from IG report

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:04 am
by RPBrown
I heard a speech was doing last week in which he said F & F started under the Bush administration.

I tried to find it online to post but couldn't remember which radio station I was on. (sucks to get old)

Re: Wide Receiver details from IG report

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:18 am
by Teamless
What I heard was Bush was doing something like this, but the biggest differences, as I understood them
1 - Mexico was involved with it, while with F&F, Mexico was not involved and totally (supposedly) unaware
2 - Under F&F, the guns were lost, under Bush, the locations were known