Page 1 of 2
BUG: .380 ACP or .38 Special?
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 8:55 pm
by Stephen A. Camp
Hello. A common topic is which of the two is the best. I've made it no secret that between .380, 9x18mm Mak, and .38 Special, I prefer the latter for "serious" purposes.
Which do you prefer and why?
Between the snub and the .380 auto, which would you prefer as a BUG?
Thanks in advance.
Best.
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:13 pm
by Jim101
It's really time of year for me.........The 380 is a good summer carry here in Texasa, Bersa for me, with +P's The 9mm is my winter carry....BTW your article on the Bersa 380 is why I bought one.......
Jim
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:15 pm
by Stephen A. Camp
Hello and thank you. I think the Bersa's are darned good little guns for the money...at least the ones I've seen and/or shot.
Best.
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:15 pm
by dws1117
As to which is best, I guess that all comes down to personal prefrence. I prefer the snub as well. Now, to be fair I cannot base this on any first hand experience with the .380 and I've only shot the 9x18 mak on 2 occasions. I didn't find the makarov enjoyable to shoot either time.
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 9:52 pm
by Chris
Jim101 wrote:It's really time of year for me.........The 380 is a good summer carry here in Texasa,
i carry a full-size 1911 and a beretta 92FS in a t-shirt and shorts. i also have a .357 magnum 640 that i can hide, but i usually carry it in my pocket, but i like my pockets free for my hands to hang out in. 8)
why compromise?
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:10 pm
by jimlongley
I usually carry a full size 1911, also, but my BUG may be an XD9, which can also be my primary, or my wife's PPKS .380, or my .32NAA Guardian.
I have shot a couple of IDPA BUG matches with the Guardian and I like it a lot more than my wife's .380. I may have lost the XD9 to my wife after she fired her perfect score on the CHL requal with it, so I am stuck with either carrying two 1911s, one as a BUG, or the NAA.
Sometimes, rarely though, I carry my BUG as a primary, but I am not real comfortable that way.
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:40 pm
by onerifle
Between the three calibers, I'd go with the .38. The Mak is a great option too, especially for the money. Size to weight, and total package considered however, I would have to give the nod to my Kahr PM9. Smaller, lighter, more compact than the Bersa, yet chambered for 9mm Parabellum. 6+1 for pocket carry, 7+1 IWB or Thunderwear, using the extended magazine. My PM9 is a lot more comfortable for me to shoot than any of the Airweight J-frames.
Although I have not shot the Bersa, it seems that nowdays Kahr and Rohrbaugh have nearly rendered the .380 obsolete for carry, IMHO.
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:58 am
by MoJo
I like both, at this time I do not have a .38 but i do have a Kel tec P3AT that rides in a DeSantis Nemisis pocket holster. The gun is small, light, and easy to carry. It is a great "get off me!" gun.
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 6:38 am
by OverEasy
Between the two choices, for me it's easy, .38 snubby. I have one. I don't own any .380 acp's or 9x18's.
:D
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 8:41 am
by gigag04
jimlongley wrote:PPKS .380
How do you like this guns performance? I used to shoot my dad's growing up alot (big james bond fan) and though it looked cool it would jam alot. Part of that was limp wrist because of my youth, but it does it for him too.
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 9:38 am
by txinvestigator
Of the 3 I prefer the .38. However, my Beretta .380 carries 13 rounds. interesting question..................
I carry a full sized 1911 even in the scorching Texas Summers though.
I had a PPK, but traded it because it alwaysbit the web of my shooting hand. :?
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 11:43 am
by stevie_d_64
I would think the simplicity and reliability of a snub-nosed .38 would be the better choice for a BUG...
Think about why and when you would actually have to use it...
Do you want a firearm you may have to "think" about how to use it???
Or do you at that point want something you can just point and shoot...Pardon the pun...
I would also say that the Bersa is a fine firearm for its size and caliber...And you can certainly stop something with one...
My philosophy is simple..."If it works, and it works for you, work it..."
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 11:55 am
by jimlongley
gigag04 wrote:jimlongley wrote:PPKS .380
How do you like this guns performance? I used to shoot my dad's growing up alot (big james bond fan) and though it looked cool it would jam alot. Part of that was limp wrist because of my youth, but it does it for him too.
It's my wife's gun and she likes it just fine. That said, I talked her into using my XD9 for her CHL requal, mostly because of the BIGGER sights, and she really loved the XD9.
I don't like the PPKS much because it just fits my hand wrong and hurts when I shoot it. My .32NAA Guardian is smaller than the PPKS but it fits my hand better and is mre comfortable to shoot.
Never seen a jam on the PPKS unless it was limp wrist.
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 1:37 pm
by Kalrog
I prefer the revolver for BUG duty - so that naturally leads me to the .38Spc as the BUG caliber. Although I wouldn't feel bad with any of the listed rounds.
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:30 pm
by ElGato
I use both, a 380 or 38, like my primary depending how I'm dressed and where I'm going, my favorite bug has to be a nickel mod. 19 S&W 2 1/2 in a Bianchi up-sidedown shoulder rig.
Maybe this comment should be on different post, but since the PPK was mentioned, when I see one come on the range I expect it to jam, and have more confidence in the Bersa. ( PPK copy )
Tomcat