Page 1 of 1
Houston: Nice tats
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:45 pm
by seamusTX

- mugshot.jpg (5.89 KiB) Viewed 1305 times
http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas ... 309976.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Alleged drug deal, shooting, eluding police, stolen vehicle.
These people share your oxygen when they are out on bail or probation.
- Jim
Re: Houston: Nice tats
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:30 pm
by 03Lightningrocks
That right there is a young man with a very promising future ahead of him.

Re: Houston: Nice tats
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:51 pm
by seamusTX
In the circus.
Or maybe the circus performs background checks now. I know carnivals do, since they had trouble with stoners maintaining rides.
- Jim
Re: Houston: Nice tats
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:03 pm
by howdy
I think he looks good dressed in orange.
Re: Houston: Nice tats
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:06 pm
by jmra
Common guys. He can't help it. He is just a product of his environment. (Sarcasm)
Re: Houston: Nice tats
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:02 am
by texanjoker
"If you ain't blasting you ain't lasting"
Re: Houston: Nice tats
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:58 pm
by Abraham
And for another perspective - I feel sorry for this young man.
With that mess on his face (and for the record, I have a tattoo, but you can't see it unless I take my shirt off) he won't readily get a good job. Even restroom attendants can't look like him...
I would also guess his I.Q. is less than adequate...
Re: Houston: Nice tats
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:22 pm
by seamusTX
Abraham wrote:And for another perspective - I feel sorry for this young man.
In that case, you can bail him out. Habeas corpus means, literally, you may have the body.
In my personal opinion, I think maybe 1 or 2% of the tattoos that I see are anything resembling "artistic." The rest look like they were applied in a dive in some disreputable third-world country.
- Jim
Re: Houston: Nice tats
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:33 pm
by Abraham
No thanks.
I just wonder how many poor dolts, due to their less adequate I.Q's become criminals?
Do I feel sorry for them like some bleeding heart liberal?
Not a chance.
Give em a blind fold, a cigarette, a few last words and ....
Re: Houston: Nice tats
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:43 pm
by seamusTX
Abraham wrote:I just wonder how many poor dolts, due to their less adequate I.Q's become criminals?
This is a fairly broad question in criminology.
Most likely the average burglar, robber, or car thief either has a congenitally low IQ or suffered some kind of severe abuse that resulted in brain damage.
On the other hand, there are plenty of smart crooks. The guys who ran Enron were such. Some smart crooks are in Congress.
- Jim
Re: Houston: Nice tats
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 2:50 pm
by Abraham
I would venture a guess most, irrespective of party, are criminals.
Look at their investment history and that enough will tell you.
These monsters run the country - arrrgggghhhhh!
Re: Houston: Nice tats
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 4:52 pm
by seamusTX
Abraham wrote:Look at their investment history and that enough will tell you.
They are just lucky.
For years I have been amazed how lucky U.S. senators are. The longer they are in office, the luckier they get.
A bank robber who comes in the front door and sticks up a cashier might get a couple of thousand dollars on a good day (for him) if he doesn't get arrested or shot. A crooked executive might get a billion and retire to some tax haven that doesn't have extradition.
- Jim
Re: Houston: Nice tats
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:31 pm
by ELB
RollCall lists the 50 richest folks in the US Congress at this link:
http://www.rollcall.com/50richest/the-5 ... 112th.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Their list is based on the reports members of the Senate and House are required to file, which significantly affects the precision of the estimates, since assets, income, and liabilities are reported in categories (e.g. $1M to $5M) rather than exact amounts.
Not all are Senators.
Seven of the top 10 richest members are Democrats, the party of the little people someone told me once. I think it was Joe Biden.
The top two places are held by Republicans (neither a senator, the top one from Texas), number 3 is Senator (now SecState, I guess) Mr. Theresa Heinz-Kerry, then comes six more Democrats, then one more Republican.
Senator I-can-have-a-concealed-handgun-but-all-you-rubes-need-to-give-up-yours Feinstein is at number 9.
Poor Nancy Pelosi, she doesn't even break into the top 10, she is only number 12, despite all her shenanigans, er....I mean
hard work when she was House Minority Leader. Looks like she didn't need to pass every piece of legislation to figure out what was in it. For her.
Reading through Roll Call's summaries, it appears that the most lucrative investment you can make if you want to be a rich member of Congress is to marry a fabulously wealthy spouse.
That's all for now, I am going to go yell at my wife about why it is her fault I will never be a rich member of Congress. Of course, neither will she.
ETA: It appears from the photos at the link that not a single rich member of Congress has facial tattoos.