Page 1 of 1
Just heard today about HB 3325
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 7:51 pm
by 2firfun50
This may be the most dangerous bill of 2013. Attempts to amend 411 regarding purchase/ownership of so called assault weapons.
http://www.legis.state.tx.us/Search/Doc ... ightType=1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Just heard today about HB 3325
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:07 pm
by AEA
Whoever authored that is a complete idiot/fool.
Re: Just heard today about HB 3325
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:08 pm
by baldeagle
Nice. $200 for the license to purchase an "assault weapon". $25 renewal fee every 2 years. $200 tax to sell it. Why do these jerks always find ways to steal more money from citizens?
Re: Just heard today about HB 3325
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:10 pm
by 2firfun50
AEA wrote:Whoever authored that is a complete idiot/fool.
Here is the distinguished gentleman.
http://www.house.state.tx.us/members/me ... strict=147" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Just heard today about HB 3325
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:16 pm
by baldeagle
AEA wrote:Whoever authored that is a complete idiot/fool.
Most likely he is. He authored a bill to amend a section of the penal code that's already been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
Re: Just heard today about HB 3325
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:28 pm
by 2firfun50
baldeagle wrote:AEA wrote:Whoever authored that is a complete idiot/fool.
Most likely he is. He authored a bill to amend a section of the penal code that's already been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
May I enquire as to which portion of ch 411, subch H has bee declared unconstitutional? That's our CHL in a nutshell.
Re: Just heard today about HB 3325
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:35 pm
by Excaliber
Democrats apparently get party points for violating their oaths of office and introducing anti constitutional legislation.
Re: Just heard today about HB 3325
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:18 pm
by baldeagle
2firfun50 wrote:baldeagle wrote:AEA wrote:Whoever authored that is a complete idiot/fool.
Most likely he is. He authored a bill to amend a section of the penal code that's already been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
May I enquire as to which portion of ch 411, subch H has bee declared unconstitutional? That's our CHL in a nutshell.
My apologies. I can see now that was poorly worded. I should have said he ALSO authored....the bill addressed the Texas Penal Code section 21.06, having to do with homosexual conduct, which has already been struck down by the Supreme Court (and it says that clearly in the code.) BTW, CH 411 is in the Government Code, not the Penal Code. Confusing it is.
Re: Just heard today about HB 3325
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:22 pm
by howdy
This guy is just wasting good air.
Re: Just heard today about HB 3325
Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 10:49 pm
by srothstein
A very interesting law. Of course, I makes it illegal for you to ever sell your used "assault weapon" by saying the only person who may sell one is an FFL. Fortunately, there is no ban or tax on transferring the weapon other ways.
I can see the price of used magazines going even higher than they are now. If you buy this used magazine from me, I will give you this rifle for free. The magazine goes for $1000.
Re: Just heard today about HB 3325
Posted: Wed Apr 03, 2013 6:55 am
by 2firfun50
baldeagle wrote:2firfun50 wrote:baldeagle wrote:AEA wrote:Whoever authored that is a complete idiot/fool.
Most likely he is. He authored a bill to amend a section of the penal code that's already been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
May I enquire as to which portion of ch 411, subch H has bee declared unconstitutional? That's our CHL in a nutshell.
My apologies. I can see now that was poorly worded. I should have said he ALSO authored....the bill addressed the Texas Penal Code section 21.06, having to do with homosexual conduct, which has already been struck down by the Supreme Court (and it says that clearly in the code.) BTW, CH 411 is in the Government Code, not the Penal Code. Confusing it is.
Thanks for the clarification. So he is THAT guy. I remember that disaster.