Page 1 of 2
No more Bud.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:15 pm
by VoiceofReason
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/1 ... ostpopular" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
“Adolphus Busch IV Resigns From NRA After Gun Control Defeat In Senate”

No more Bud.
Re: No more Bud.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:19 pm
by JALLEN
Maybe. Adolphus IV has nothing to do with the business. It's Augustus IV that has gotten most of the negative attention.
If you like the beer, I'd drink it anyway. If you don't, you're already drinking something else.
I've never known a Texan that needed to drink Bud, but every man for himself in that!
Re: No more Bud.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:21 pm
by baldeagle
Big deal. Another rich man who never has to worry about being attacked wants us peons to submit to the will of the communists. I'm not impressed.
Re: No more Bud.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:35 pm
by Mike1951
Nothing new here!
I recall seeing Anheiser-Busch being on the NRA's list of anti businesses decades ago.
Re: No more Bud.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:41 pm
by VoiceofReason
Well, I enjoy Bud Light from time to time but if he wants to use the name for politics there are other brands I will try.
I am proud of myself for not putting a bad “hard to swallow” pun in here.

Re: No more Bud.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:32 pm
by sjfcontrol
Hmmmm, it's Busch's fault!
Don't let the screen door hit ya on the way out.
Re: No more Bud.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:45 pm
by Ameer
sjfcontrol wrote:Hmmmm, it's Busch's fault!
Well, his name
is Adolph.
viewtopic.php?f=83&t=65433" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: No more Bud.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:23 pm
by G26ster
The Busch family doesn't own Anheuser Busch anymore. Sold to Belgian/Brazilian InBev in 2008.
Re: No more Bud.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:32 pm
by SF18C
I don't drink Coors cause it comes from "gun free" Colorado. Now Bud??
Dang...guess I'll go get me some Lone Star Bock! Now that is Texas!
Re: No more Bud.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:36 pm
by CowboyEngineer
I've always preferred Shiner Bock anyway.
Re: No more Bud.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:30 pm
by chasfm11
CowboyEngineer wrote:I've always preferred Shiner Bock anyway.
X2
Sorry but my opinion of Bud has always been that the Clydesdales were not just for show.

Re: No more Bud.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:37 pm
by K.Mooneyham
CowboyEngineer wrote:I've always preferred Shiner Bock anyway.
I'm with you on this one, CowboyEngineer!

Re: No more Bud.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 9:19 pm
by packa45
Never been a fan of Busch produts. I'm more of a shiner guy
Re: No more Bud.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 9:22 pm
by jmra
I don't drink. Where do the owners of Blue Bell stand? Never mind, I don't want to know!
Re: No more Bud.
Posted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 12:58 am
by TexasGal
Dear Mr Busch; Don't let the door hit you in the behind on the way out. I'm sure you can afford bodyguards no matter what rights the rest of us are forced to give up. I happen to like the direction the NRA has taken just fine. No apologies for standing up for my gun rights is preferable to caving in and giving them away. Its just common sense.