The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://mail.texaschlforum.com/
Nope. HB657 died in committee. This would have removed the requirement and DPS would only issue a rear plate. So I looks like both are still required, but no penalty for a missing front plate.puma guy wrote:Did the 83rd Legislature do anything to remedy the lack of a penalty that was inadvertently omitted/eliminated last session for failure to display front license plates?
Nor has mine, though there are some alternative mounts that are acceptable.daniel2002p wrote:My car has not had a front plate since new. I cannot get myself to drill holes into a shiny new bumper. I'll deal with the consequences.
You're missing the whole point for the Front Plate..........Beiruty wrote:The front license should be gone. The cop can read the one in the back of a car. Acutally, if the driver is pulled over, there is no need for the license plate number. He would get the DL and insurance paper, pronto.
Yes, and it is a favorite place for the cop to aim his laser speed gun giving me 1 second more to slow down.AEA wrote:You're missing the whole point for the Front Plate..........Beiruty wrote:The front license should be gone. The cop can read the one in the back of a car. Acutally, if the driver is pulled over, there is no need for the license plate number. He would get the DL and insurance paper, pronto.
It is primarily used for red light cameras which brings in the revenue!
The citation is not the issue, the law is still on the books.RX8er wrote:Who knows what citation could be issued?
Maybe it's a test. If someone doesn't know better, they'll pay what the ticket says, no matter if they're legally obligated to.E.Marquez wrote:The citation is not the issue, the law is still on the books.RX8er wrote:Who knows what citation could be issued?
It's the penalty which is in question and who will adjudicate the charge should the person cited decide to contest and ask for a day in court.
Just so you know.. Windshield location does not meet the requirements of the law.according to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. ...If the trooper or other LEO has/will be citing you because he knows the law and appropriate court rulings ( the LEOs I know,, understand this as they use it as PC for a stop)...your plan will not get you passed it.daniel2002p wrote:I keep my front plate in the glove box with four suction cups I purchased at Ace just in case I get pulled over and get a talking to about it I can just suction it to the windshield. So far have not had to resort to that.
--Daniel
"The law seems simple enough. Nevertheless, the past two years of case law updates have given readers interesting court
opinions debating the requirement that a license plate be displayed at the front and rear of the vehicle. The Austin Court
of Appeals held that Section 502.404 does not require that the front license plate be displayed on the front bumper, just
that the plate be visible from the front of the vehicle.4
In contrast, the Amarillo Court of Appeals held that the front license
plate must be displayed on the foremost area of the car.5
The Court of Criminal Appeals settled the disagreement in Spence
v. State, 325 S.W.3d 646 (2010) when it agreed with the Amarillo Court of Appeals and held that the statute requires the
license plate to be on the foremost area or beginning of the car, most commonly the front bumper.6
Judge Meyers, in a
dissent joined by Judge Hervey, posited that if the front of the vehicle means the front bumper, then the rear of the vehicle
should mean the back bumper; however, most often, rear plates are mounted on the vehicle’s trunk and not the actual
bumper. Judge Meyers opined that “[t]he only thing about this statute that is clear is that it is not well written.”