Page 1 of 1

Prince George of Cambridge

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:21 pm
by sjfcontrol
Apparently the Royal Couple have decided on a name. Prince George of Cambridge.

All this means to me is that at some time in the future, we may have to deal with "King George" -- again! :evil2:

Re: Prince George of Cambridge

Posted: Wed Jul 24, 2013 2:41 pm
by gthaustex
If only the unwashed masses in this country were as concerned about the government here as they are about the future figurehead of the UK.....sigh... :grumble

Re: Prince George of Cambridge

Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 9:49 am
by RogueUSMC
Better than Ralph I guess...

Re: Prince George of Cambridge

Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 9:50 am
by bdickens
Well, Whoopdie Doo!

We went to war a couple of centuries ago so that we didn't have to deal with the English throne and yet we still can't shake our obsession with it.

Re: Prince George of Cambridge

Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 9:55 am
by johncanfield
bdickens wrote:Well, Whoopdie Doo!

We went to war a couple of centuries ago so that we didn't have to deal with the English throne and yet we still can't shake our obsession with it.
:iagree: I was hoping they would name him Prince King

Poor Brits - another "royal" mouth to feed...

Re: Prince George of Cambridge

Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 10:44 am
by Keith B
I heard they were going to name him John Paul George. They thought about John Paul George Ringo, but no one likes Ringo. :lol:

Re: Prince George of Cambridge

Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:33 am
by CHLLady
I'm so happy for them!

They are just figureheads now, but they bring in millions in revenue each year. It supposedly costs each subject less than a pound per year, I think around 58p to pay their "wages". While I admire the history, I am so proud to be an American and grateful to have the freedoms we have. And I'm so glad we don't spend $10 a gallon on gas as they do to support their socialist society. I have a feeling we are headed that way. Their society might work to their benefit if they weren't letting in masses of poverty stricken immigrants that drain the coffers.

Re: Prince George of Cambridge

Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 6:33 pm
by Oldgringo
CHLLady wrote:
{snip}
Their society might work to their benefit if they weren't letting in masses of poverty stricken immigrants that drain the coffers.
What's this "Immigration Bill" about that I keep hearing of in this country?

Re: Prince George of Cambridge

Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 6:38 pm
by psijac
Image

Re: Prince George of Cambridge

Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:16 pm
by sjfcontrol
psijac wrote:[ Image ]
Ok -- NOW I get it! :smilelol5:

Re: Prince George of Cambridge

Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:36 pm
by cheezit
i thought there was a war so we didnt have to care about the royal famly any longer.

Re: Prince George of Cambridge

Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:51 pm
by sjfcontrol
cheezit wrote:i thought there was a war so we didnt have to care about the royal famly any longer.
But, they care so much about us. They named the baby after Zimmerman!

Re: Prince George of Cambridge

Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 11:42 pm
by CHLLady
Oldgringo wrote:
CHLLady wrote:
{snip}
Their society might work to their benefit if they weren't letting in masses of poverty stricken immigrants that drain the coffers.
What's this "Immigration Bill" about that I keep hearing of in this country?
Yes, point well made, but the whole of their island can fit into Texas 2.8 times. Lol. They can't support the influx of non-contributors. Not that we can continue either.

Re: Prince George of Cambridge

Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 6:22 am
by Cedar Park Dad
sjfcontrol wrote:Apparently the Royal Couple have decided on a name. Prince George of Cambridge.

All this means to me is that at some time in the future, we may have to deal with "King George" -- again! :evil2:
Considering most of my ancestors at one time or another threw a spear or took a shot at the English all I care to say about royalty is:
“Libertie! Equalitie! Fraternitie!" :anamatedbanana