Jumping Frog wrote:MadMonkey wrote:The key is to not be an idiot about it. I don't have a problem with people texting and driving, unless they're doing it at a time when they're putting other people at risk (I.E. in traffic, in neighborhoods, etc). It's possible to pay attention to both the road and a phone, but beyond most people's capacity.
As I handle risk management for my transportation-related company, I am well acquainted with the studies and data on this topic. Your post displays either significant ignorance on the subject or a willful denial of the facts. I would respectfully urge you to reconsider this subject.
The only time I am willing to read or send a text message when behind the wheel is if I am sitting stopped by the side of the road or at a red light. A person who is texting while driving is as impaired as an intoxicated driver.
At 55 mph, you cover 80.7 fps. A 2 second distraction puts you 161.4 ft further down the road before you look up. A 10 second distraction puts you 807 ft further down the road before you look up. . . . . . and this assumes that you're driving a straight line and keeping within your lane. . . . .
9 times out of 10 these days, when I see someone behind the wheel who appears to be obviously intoxicated, if I catch up to them and can actually see them, they're not drunk. They're texting.
The fact is, I don't believe that
most drivers are that skilled, even sober, and even without a phone in their hands. MadMonkey, this is not to beat up on you personally. I know you personally to be a man of integrity. But I have to respond with a couple of thoughts. . . .
One: It is a scientifically proven fact that the human brain actually cannot multitask. It isn't designed to. Its circuits don't work that way. It cannot "multi-thread." What
can happen is that a rare number of individuals can train their minds to change tracks back and forth more quickly than others. But even
they are not parallel processing data. They are switching back and forth between data streams. They just do it faster than the average human. The problem with this is that a given data stream does not stop streaming while your focus has been drawn away from it and onto another data stream. The missing data cannot be recaptured once you switch back to the previous data stream. It is lost data. Consequently, even if you hold your phone up in front of your face and convince yourself that you can peripherally see what is happening through the windshield, that's not what is actually happening. Yes, your eye is seeing the blurred changing color and light values in the background when you look at your phone, but your eye does not end at the back of your eyeball. The human eye is actually an extension of the human brain, and your brain is not processing and obtaining any meaning out of those blurred background shifts in color or light, because it is busy processing and obtaining meaning out of what it sees on the phone's display. This very immutable fact about how the human brain is constructed is what makes things like sleight of hand tricks possible. Even though
both of the magician's hands are in plain sight, you are focused on the hand that
he has drawn your focus to, and you literally do not
see what the other hand is doing, even though it it is happening right in front of you. This is why you cannot actually
see the road you are traveling down, right in front of your face, when you are also looking at the phone display, right in front of your face.
Two: As I mentioned, those individuals who are able to make the switch between data streams more quickly than other individuals are actually few and far between. Even so, the laws of nature are immutable, and during the time they are focused on Data Stream B, the data flowing through Data Stream A is still being lost. They are just losing smaller increments of it. You yourself said:
MadMonkey wrote:It's possible to pay attention to both the road and a phone, but beyond most people's capacity.
I submit that ALL drivers lack the capacity. It's just that some suck at it less than others. . . . .and that's simple biology.
Everybody who tries to defy biology is an idiot. It's just that some are bigger idiots than others, and that is tied directly to the degree that they are in denial about their lack of skills or impairment of skills.
And that includes me too, so I'm not singling you out as an idiot. Me? I have a foolproof system. . . . .I hand the phone to my wife and tell her, "read that to me." If it is from a client, and it is
really important, then I tell her, "type this [......] and hit send."
I'll talk on the phone hands-free. To me that is no worse than talking to my passenger. But I won't text because I can't account for what is going to happen during the precious seconds my eye is drawn away from the road.
Jumping Frog, one of my best friends is a risk assessment specialist for an insurance brokerage of which he is part owner. Don't get him started on texting while driving. If this video isn't a deterrent, then the actuarial numbers ought to be. They are significantly bad.