TexasCHLforum.com

Great analogy!

I loved it when this was brought up on Piers' show and he nearly blew a gasket. It's almost like he thinks people have a right to owning a car and not a gun but I'm not positive that he thinks.

CoffeeNut wrote:I loved it when this was brought up on Piers' show and he nearly blew a gasket. It's almost like he thinks people have a right to owning a car and not a gun but I'm not positive that he thinks.

he thinks what the queen told him to think, it has no independent thought it only parrots what it is told to spew, and of course the subjects must do as told

Anti-gunners always say: "But a car's intended purpose is not to kill someone. A gun has no other purpose than to kill people."

It makes no sense to them that it's the MISUSE of either object that murders people; of course, they also believe in the "kill = murder" equivalency fallacy. I've even had someone I work with tell me that every soldier who's ever killed anyone in war has committed murder, as well as any police officer who has killed anyone.

You can't use logic against the liberal mindset because logic plays no part IN their mindset. They are driven solely by emotion. That's where you need to hit them.

Haha heck yea... ive had that in my signature for some time. Never read anything more true than that.

Yeah... I like that.

Kythas wrote: That's where you need to hit them.

Vehicle deaths for 2010 in the US was 32,887 and firearms related deaths was 31,672. US census data for 2010 shows 308.75 million people. Number of vehicles in the US for 2010 was close to 246 million. Estimated number of guns in US for 2010 was 310 million. You can do the math to see percentages. Vehicles are not designed to kill people but do so at a higher percentage than firearms per capita.

Makes you think for the next time an anti-gunner spouts off.