TexasCHLforum.com

This is nuts.

http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/24/newsp ... un-owners/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Won't happen here in Texas or several other states that will not release CHL info to anyone but law enforcement.

rlytle_98 wrote:This is nuts.

http://dailycaller.com/2014/01/24/newsp ... un-owners/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

CHL info should be privileged info and not public info. Privacy matters for US Citizens.

Unacceptable! One hacker and they get the info. Why not publish a list of welfare recioients?

Yeah, right that have no plan to publish the data. Push for constitutional carry and there would be fewer concerns.

I think the states should release the reports to the media or whomever requests it via FOIR. They just need to do as the Obama administration and redact all pertinent information such as addresses, names, and any other information that may identify a chl holder or where they are.

Not that I think this will happen, but if it does, someone should do like they in New York I think it was and publish the names and addresses of the newspaper staff. Turnabout is fair play, right?

scottmeador wrote:Yeah, right that have no plan to publish the data. Push for constitutional carry and there would be fewer concerns.

It will be interesting to see what this group does with AZ.

txglock21 wrote:Not that I think this will happen, but if it does, someone should do like they in New York I think it was and publish the names and addresses of the newspaper staff. Turnabout is fair play, right?

(it was New York....)

I want all of my hair back . . . but I'm not going to get that either.

Chas.

txglock21 wrote:Not that I think this will happen, but if it does, someone should do like they in New York I think it was and publish the names and addresses of the newspaper staff. Turnabout is fair play, right?

Even including maps to their homes. I applaud my brother members of the NYSR&PA of which I am a Life Member.

Charles L. Cotton wrote:I want all of my hair back . . . but I'm not going to get that either.

Chas.

I shave mine off, except for my mustache.

Just adding the Fox News article (headlined as of right now):

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/01/24/ne ... databases/

texanjoker wrote:Unacceptable! One hacker and they get the info. Why not publish a list of welfare recioients?

I have to agree with you TJ. You only need to do a Google search on the interwebs to find out that Gov. computers are suceptible to hacking.

British man allegedly hacked U.S. government networks
http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/28/politics/ ... s-charges/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Government Hacked: 24,000 Files Stolen in Worst Pentagon Cyber Attack
http://www.ibtimes.com/government-hacke ... ack-298771" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Five indicted in largest hacking scheme in U.S. history
http://bgr.com/2013/07/26/u-s-hacking-scheme-charges/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


That's why I must side with scottmeador:

scottmeador wrote:Yeah, right that have no plan to publish the data. Push for constitutional carry and there would be fewer concerns.

If a burglar breaks into a house to rob it because the newspaper's list says there are no guns there, and then he gets shot, can he sue them for damages?

android wrote:If a burglar breaks into a house to rob it because the newspaper's list says there are no guns there, and then he gets shot, can he sue them for damages?

Yes! And it would fall under the category of: You can't make this (insert expletive here) up.