TexasCHLforum.com

This is not just bizarre to me, it's down right disturbing.

http://www.ksat.com/news/man-accused-of ... d/25643446

That guy would never get close enough to my kid to stab him.

jmra wrote:That guy would never get close enough to my kid to stab him.

You don't have to try very hard to profile that guy.

Goodness. This animal needs to be put down.

ajwakeboarder wrote:

jmra wrote:That guy would never get close enough to my kid to stab him.

You don't have to try very hard to profile that guy.

He seems friendly.

Just look at the
ink.

rbwhatever1 wrote:Goodness. This animal needs to be put down.

And the gun grabbers wonder why we want to carry around where kids play.

Its seems the new thing is that the defense attorney will wants his client to get the government (taxpayers) to pay for his tattoo removal, so he can get a fair trial.

For some reason, jurors look at the guy and think he is guilty.

Really?

Awesome. Let's remove his tattoos...

He's called "cucuy," which means "boogeyman" or "monster" in Mexico and several other Spanish-speaking nations. And police in Houston say that's exactly what this man is.

Jose Guillermo Molina, 21, who has tattoos all over his face, is accused of stabbing a 3-year-old boy multiple times in the neck on Tuesday.
He grabbed the little boy by his hair, pulled the neck back, stabbed him in the neck three times," neighbor Lydia Hernandez told Click2Houston.com.

"After he stabbed him, he put the little boy on the ground and he put his knee on the little boy's chest and he was trying to choke him."

Molina, who has a tattoo of a happy face on his left cheek, has a previous conviction for attacking his mother, according to reports.

I am glad that he is being held without bail.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/2 ... e&ir=Crime" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I think demon is probably better. Give him a fair trial, then throw his butt in prison and leave him there. Let his tats droop and fade. Let his name be forgotten, his deeds a small scar on this boys past.

I was surprised by the terminology used. "The mother confronted him", that man is darn lucky that it was not my kid because I would have done more than "confront" a person that stabbed my child.

mamabearCali wrote:I think demon is probably better. Give him a fair trial, then throw his butt in prison and leave him there. Let his tats droop and fade. Let his name be forgotten, his deeds a small scar on this boys past.

I was surprised by the terminology used. "The mother confronted him", that man is darn lucky that it was not my kid because I would have done more than "confront" a person that stabbed my child.

Well stated mamabear.

rbwhatever1 wrote:Awesome. Let's remove his tattoos...

[ Image ]

I would offer him a can of hairspray and a lighter so he could remove them himself but I like your idea better.

I think it's easy to justify deadly force if this were your own child being attacked.

How about if you were a parent of another child at the playground when this happened. Would you get involved to protect someone else's child in this case?

healthinsp wrote:I think it's easy to justify deadly force if this were your own child being attacked.

How about if you were a parent of another child at the playground when this happened. Would you get involved to protect someone else's child in this case?

Is this a serious question?