winters wrote:im also a huge dork and want a moa reticle not mrad.
There's nothing wrong with MOA reticles per se. They are fine if the click values of the elevation and windage knobs are
also in MOA. But even in a scope that has an MOA reticle and 1/4"/click adjusters,
they are not matched. 1 MOA is
not 1" at 100 yards, like most people think. It's actually 1.047 inches. That's not a big deal maybe at 100 yards, or even at 500 yards, especially for hunting purposes, but at 1,000 yards while target shooting, 1 MOA is 10.47", almost a half inch of deviation. And if your adjustments don't track 100% true all the way out (most scopes, even most high end scopes don't), then at 1,000 yards, you can't really count on the scope.......... unless you
already know how far off your deviation is at that distance and can compensate for it.
Back in the day, mil-dot scopes tended to have 1/4" clicks on the knobs, which meant that you had to do some math in your head to convert inches to mils just to figure out how many clicks of the knob would match the change you needed to see in your reticle...... Made no kind of sense. But when I bought my first mil-dot scope, a 10x fixed power SWFA with HD glass, it came with .1mil clicks on the knobs, and the oval USMC type dots. I fell in love with milling reticles and .1mil adjustments. It reduces zeroing to a 2-shot affair, and makes any on-the-fly adjustments into a base 10 affair with no conversion math. If your POI is .5 mil left and .8 mil high from your POA, you dial in 5 clicks right and 8 clicks down, and you should be dead on—assuming both you and the rifle are up to it. My last two variable power scope purchases—both the 5-20x SFWA and the 4-16x Vortex—have had "milling" rather than "mil-dot" reticles, meaning that instead of dots at 1 mil increments, they use subtension hash marks at the 1mil increments, with shorter subtension hash marks at .5mil points. And then at the extremities, the last 2.5mil have .2mil hash marks, giving you finer accuracy of adjustment at longer ranges.
The PST MOA scopes have matching turrets, so the principles would be the same.
winters wrote:well i went to go look at the vortex 6x24 and i can't even hardly see the subdivisions on the reticle. i don't remember the night force being that small.
By "went and looked", are you meaning you looked at the website, or the actual scope? And if you looked at the actual scope, did you actually play with the variable power? If you were looking at an FFP (First Focal Plane) scope, then the appearance of the reticle shrinks and grows with the magnification settings. The Nightforce you were looking at would do the same thing.
THIS is the reticle with the zoom backed all the way out, meaning 4x on the 4-16, or 6x on the 6-24:
THIS is the reticle zoomed all the way in, meaning 16x on the 4-16, or 24x on the 6-24:
FFP scopes have a distinct advantage over SFP (Second Focal Plane) scopes. Because the reticle size changes according to magnification on FFP scopes, the relationships between the hashmarks on the reticle and the click values on the knobs remain unchanged. A .1mil (or 1/4 MOA) adjustment at 4x is still a .1mil adjustment at 16x. If you have a SFP scope, the reticle will always look "zoomed in" no matter the magnification, but that means that the relationship between the hashmarks and the knobs is only valid at
one point along the magnification range. That point is typically the halfway point between the highest and lowest magnifications. So if you get the 6-24 with a SFP reticle, then the measurements on the reticle are ONLY valid at 15x (24x-6x=18x, 18x÷2=9x, 6x+9x=15x), and they will be useless for either ranging OR making adjustments at any other magnification power.
OTH, SFP scopes are cheaper to make, and that's why they cost a lot less than FFP in the same scope. And like I said, the Nightforce or any other premium brand with a FFP reticle will be exactly the same way.